My Opinion by Joe Eiben

June 19, 2009

DIVORCE AGREEMENT 2009

Filed under: National — Joe Eiben @ 12:44 am

DIVORCE AGREEMENT 2009

Dear American liberals, leftists, social progressives, socialists,> Marxists, Obama supporters, et al:

We have stuck together since the late 1950’s, but the whole of this latest election process has made me realize that I want a divorce. I know we tolerated each other for many years for the sake of future generations, but sadly, this relationship has run its course. Our two ideological sides of America cannot and will not ever agree on what is right so let’s just end it on friendly terms. We can smile and chalk it up to> irreconcilable differences and go our own way.
Here is a model separation agreement:
Our two groups can equitably divide up the country by landmass each taking a portion. That will be the difficult part, but I am sure our two sides can come to a friendly agreement. After that, it should be relatively easy! Our respective representatives can effortlessly divide other assets since both sides have such distinct and disparate tastes.
We don’t like redistributive taxes so you can keep them. You are welcome to the liberal judges and the ACLU, and abortion clinics. Since you hate guns and war, we’ll take our firearms, the cops, the NRA and the military. You can keep Oprah, Michael Moore and Rosie O’Donnell…
We’ll keep the capitalism, greedy corporations, pharmaceutical companies, Wal-Mart and Wall Street. You can have your beloved homeless, homeboys, hippies and illegal aliens. We’ll keep the hot Alaskan hockey moms and rednecks. We’ll keep the Bibles and give you NBC and Hollywood .
You can make nice with Iran and Palestine and we’ll retain the right to invade and hammer places that threaten us. You can have the peaceniks, and war protesters. When our allies or our way of life are under assault, we’ll help provide them security.
We’ll keep our Judeo-Christian values. You are welcome to Islam, Scientology, Humanism and Shirley McClain. You can also have the U.N., but we will no longer be paying the bill.
We’ll keep the SUVs, pickup trucks and oversized luxury cars. You can take every Subaru station wagon you can find.
You can give everyone healthcare if you can find any practicing doctors. We’ll continue to believe healthcare is a luxury and not a right. We’ll keep The Battle Hymn of the Republic and the National Anthem. I’m sure you’ll be happy to substitute I’d Like to Teach the World to Sing, Kum Ba Ya or We Are the World.
We’ll practice trickle down economics and you can give trickle up poverty your best shot. Since it often so offends you, we’ll keep our history, our name and our flag.
Would you agree to this? If so, please pass it along to other like minded liberal and conservative patriots and if you do not agree, just hit delete. In the spirit of friendly parting, I’ll bet you ANWAR which one of us will need whose help in 15 years.

Sincerely,

John J. Wall
Law Student and an American
P.S. Also, please take Barbara Streisand and Jane Fonda with you.

June 15, 2009

Pay

Filed under: National — Joe Eiben @ 5:58 am

Why do we not care what our elected officials are paid? We pay our federal elected official some pretty good money and great benefits. Some of our local elected officials must take money out of their own pockets to do their jobs.

When we do not pay atention to the pay we have either people who do it for ego or for power. These are not very good reasons to be an elected position.

Pay attention!

May 25, 2009

Good Bye Nevada

Filed under: Nevada — @ 4:53 am

It is time for us to leave and return to California,

It seems to me Nevada is headed down the slippery slope that California has been on for the past many years. I have been there and do not want to repeat ths fun. I feel that California has hot bottom as demonstrated by the last vote to raise taxes for more services. Last time they said to same couple marriages and now voting against more services.

We also have another financial reason. It is expensive to continue to visit our children and their children. I feel the tax  revolt will be greater in California as they need it more then almost any on else. I will be there and involved.

Good bye Nevada!

May 15, 2009

H.R. 1388

Filed under: National — @ 7:02 pm

Whether you are an Obama fan, or not, EVERYONE IN THE U. S.  needs to know….

Something happened… H.R. 1388 was passed yesterday, behind
our backs. You may want to read about it. It wasn’t mentioned on the
news… just went by on the ticker tape at the bottom of the CNN screen.

Obama funds $20M in tax payer dollars to immigrate Hamas
Refugees to the USA. This is the news that didn’t make the headlines…

By executive order, President Barack Obama has ordered the
expenditure of $20.3 million in “migration assistance” to the
Palestinian refugees and “conflict victims” in Gaza.

The “presidential determination“, which allows hundreds of
thousands of Palestinians with ties to Hamas to resettle in the United
States, was signed on January 27 and appeared in the Federal Register
on February 4.

Few on Capitol Hill, or in the media, took note that the
order provides a free ticket replete with housing and food allowances
to individuals who have displayed their overwhelming support to the
Islamic Resistance Movement (Hamas) in the parliamentary election of
January 2006.

Let’s review…itemized list of some of Barack Obama’s most
recent actions since his inauguration:

His first call to any head of state, as president, was to
Mahmoud Abbas, leader of Fatah party in the Palestinian territory.

His first one-on-one television interview with any news
organization was with Al Arabia television.

His first executive order was to fund/facilitate abortion(s)
not just here within the U. S., but within the world, using U. S. tax
payer funds.

He ordered Guantanamo Bay closed and all military trials of
detainees halted.

He ordered overseas CIA interrogation centers closed.

He withdrew all charges against the masterminds behind the
USS Cole and the “terror attack” on 9/11.

Now we learn that he is allowing hundreds of thousands of
Palestinian refugees to move to, and live in, the US at American
taxpayer expense.

These important, and insightful, issues are being “lost” in
the blinding bail-outs and “stimulation” packages.

Doubtful? To verify this for yourself:
www.thefederalregister.com/d.p/2009-02-04-E9-2488

PLEASE PASS THIS ON… AMERICA NEEDS TO KNOW
We are losing this country at a rapid pace.

May 14, 2009

Our New Health Care?

Filed under: National — @ 11:21 pm


WASHINGTON – House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said Wednesday that her chamber would have a sweeping health care bill on the floor by the end of July, an announcement that President Barack Obama hailed.

“That’s the kind of urgency and determination that we need to achieve what I believe will be historic legislation,” the president said at the White House, standing on the south driveway with Pelosi and Democratic leaders of the relevant House committees.

“Our health care system is broken,” Obama said. “We are not going to rest until we’ve delivered the kind of health care reform that’s going to bring down costs for families, improve quality, affordability, accessibility for all Americans.”

Pelosi, D-Calif., and other House Democrats had met with Obama and Vice President Joe Biden in the Oval Office just before going outside to make their announcement. No Republicans were present, and neither were any senators.

“We promised him that we will have this important legislation on the floor of the House before the August break,” Pelosi announced. “Our goal is to have a healthier America.”

Neither the speaker nor the president offered details of how the legislation will look, the subject of ongoing debate on Capitol Hill. The White House is remaining mostly quiet as proposals emerge for discussion among lawmakers, preferring to let Congress come up with a plan and engage more on the specifics later on.

Obama’s plan to provide coverage to some 50 million uninsured Americans is the cornerstone of his promise to enact a larger overhaul of the health care system. Independent experts put the costs at about $1.5 trillion over 10 years.

But turning that vision into reality remains the biggest challenge for the president and his backers, because hard cash — not just ideas — is required to cover upfront costs of expanding coverage.

The final financing package is likely to include a mix of tax increases and spending cuts in federal health programs. Among the possibilities are tax increases on alcoholic beverages, tobacco products and sugary soft drinks, and restrictions on other health care-related tax breaks, such as flexible spending accounts.

Senators also are considering limiting — but not eliminating — the tax-free status of employer-provided health benefits.

Employer-provided health insurance technically is considered part of workers’ compensation, but unlike wages, it is not taxed. The forgone revenue to the federal government amounts to about $250 billion a year.

So even if they’re lucky enough to avoid going to the doctor or hospital, and never use their job-based health insurance, some Americans may find themselves paying taxes on at least part of its value.

Some taxes don’t seem to be on the table, such as a federal sales levy to pay for health care or a new payroll tax.

On the question of taxing health benefits, Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus, D-Mont., who chaired a round table of senators on Tuesday, is staking out a position that could put him at odds with Obama.

The president adamantly opposed such taxes during the campaign, arguing they would undermine job-based coverage. Obama’s aides now say he’s open to suggestions from Congress, even if he criticized Republican presidential rival John McCain for proposing a sweeping version of the same basic idea.

Baucus said he wants to modify the tax break, not abolish it.

“We are not going to repeal it,” he said.

Baucus suggested that the benefit could be limited by taxing health insurance provided to high-income individuals, although he did not specify at w hat income levels. He also said that plans offering rich benefits — for example, no co-payments or deductibles — might be taxed once their value exceeded a yet-to-be-determined threshold.Many experts say Congress won’t be able to come up with the kind of money needed to provide coverage for all unless limitations on the health care tax break are part of the mix.

April 28, 2009

Why is the media so biased?

Filed under: Uncategorized — @ 5:39 am

What can the reason be that our great media does not explore all information from all sides?  Can our great media be compromised? Has our media been compromised? How come we have more questions then answers?  Please, ask questions! Learn who is telling the truth as the truth will set you free.

Never believe every thing you read or hear. No one is 100% correct all the time. You have a mind, please, use it and make up your own mind. If all the people that signed the contracts for loans they could not afford would have asked questions or did thier research, they would not be in fore closure today. IF IT SEEMS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE , IT IS!

April 2, 2009

Pay Raises who deserve them?

Filed under: National, Nevada — Joe Eiben @ 4:59 am

Why are the pay raises for the senate and congress being ignored? Why are the pay raises for the parliment in England being ignored?

Why can our elected officials take a pay raise but make everyone else feel guilty? I think the pay cuts should start at the top. The new VOLUTEER CEO at AIG is working for $1 a year even the govenor of California works for a $1 a year. I know not every one can afford to work for a dollar a year BUT if they expect to cut the average wage earners 6% or more they als should be cut at least 6% or more as an example of leadership. All pay raise at ALL levels should be frozen in times like this. There is no reason or exceptions that should carry any weight.

Isn’t leadership convincing others to follow them with a little faith, maybe blind faith. Leadership is not only giving orders but convincing others that you can make a better decision then they can.

March 3, 2009

Why Skilled Immigrants Are Leaving the U.S.

Filed under: National, Other peoples — Joe Eiben @ 4:49 pm

Why Skilled Immigrants Are Leaving the U.S.

As the debate over H-1B workers and skilled immigrants intensifies, we are losing sight of one important fact: The U.S. is no longer the only land of opportunity. If we don’t want the immigrants who have fueled our innovation and economic growth, they now have options elsewhere. Immigrants are returning home in greater numbers. And new research shows they are returning to enjoy a better quality of life, better career prospects, and the comfort of being close to family and friends.

Earlier research by my team suggested that a crisis was brewing because of a burgeoning immigration backlog. At the end of 2006, more than 1 million skilled professionals (engineers, scientists, doctors, researchers) and their families were in line for a yearly allotment of only 120,000 permanent resident visas. The wait time for some people ran longer than a decade. In the meantime, these workers were trapped in “immigration limbo.” If they changed jobs or even took a promotion, they risked being pushed to the back of the permanent residency queue. We predicted that skilled foreign workers would increasingly get fed up and return to countries like India and China where the economies were booming.

Why should we care? Because immigrants are critical to the country’s long-term economic health. Despite the fact that they constitute only 12% of the U.S. population, immigrants have started 52% of Silicon Valley’s technology companies and contributed to more than 25% of our global patents. They make up 24% of the U.S. science and engineering workforce holding bachelor’s degrees and 47% of science and engineering workers who have PhDs. Immigrants have co-founded firms such as Google (NasdaqGS:GOOG - News), Intel (NasdaqGS:INTC - News), eBay (NasdaqGS:EBAY - News), and Yahoo! (NasdaqGS:YHOO - News).

Who Are They? Young and Well-Educated

We tried to find hard data on how many immigrants had returned to India and China. No government authority seems to track these numbers. But human resources directors in India and China told us that what was a trickle of returnees a decade ago had become a flood. Job applications from the U.S. had increased tenfold over the last few years, they said. To get an understanding of how the returnees had fared and why they left the U.S., my team at Duke, along with AnnaLee Saxenian of the University of California at Berkeley and Richard Freeman of Harvard University, conducted a survey. Through professional networking site LinkedIn, we tracked down 1,203 Indian and Chinese immigrants who had worked or received education in the U.S. and had returned to their home countries. This research was funded by the Kauffman Foundation.

Our new paper, “America’s Loss Is the World’s Gain,” finds that the vast majority of these returnees were relatively young. The average age was 30 for Indian returnees, and 33 for Chinese. They were highly educated, with degrees in management, technology, or science. Fifty-one percent of the Chinese held master’s degrees and 41% had PhDs. Sixty-six percent of the Indians held a master’s and 12.1% had PhDs. They were at very top of the educational distribution for these highly educated immigrant groups — precisely the kind of people who make the greatest contribution to the U.S. economy and to business and job growth.

Nearly a third of the Chinese returnees and a fifth of the Indians came to the U.S. on student visas. A fifth of the Chinese and nearly half of the Indians entered on temporary work visas (such as the H-1B). The strongest factor that brought them to the U.S. was professional and educational development opportunities.

What They Miss: Family and Friends

They found life in the U.S. had many drawbacks. Returnees cited language barriers, missing their family and friends at home, difficulty with cultural assimilation, and care of parents and children as key issues. About a third of the Indians and a fifth of the Chinese said that visas were a strong factor in their decision to return home, but others left for opportunity and to be close to family and friends. And it wasn’t just new immigrants who were returning. In fact, 30% of respondents held permanent resident status or were U.S. citizens.

Eighty-seven percent of Chinese and 79% of Indians said a strong factor in their original decision to return home was the growing demand for their skills in their home countries. Their instincts generally proved right. Significant numbers moved up the organization chart. Among Indians the percentage of respondents holding senior management positions increased from 10% in the U.S. to 44% in India, and among Chinese it increased from 9% in the U.S. to 36% in China. Eighty-seven percent of Chinese and 62% of Indians said they had better opportunities for longer-term professional growth in their home countries than in the U.S. Additionally, nearly half were considering launching businesses and said entrepreneurial opportunities were better in their home countries than in the U.S.

Friends and family played an equally strong role for 88% of Indians and 77% of Chinese. Care for aging parents was considered by 89% of Indians and 79% of Chinese to be much better in their home countries. Nearly 80% of Indians and 67% of Chinese said family values were better in their home countries.

More Options Back Home

Immigrants who have arrived at America’s shores have always felt lonely and homesick. They had to make big personal sacrifices to provide their children with better opportunities than they had. But they never have had the option to return home. Now they do, and they are leaving.

It isn’t all rosy back home. Indians complained of traffic and congestion, lack of infrastructure, excessive bureaucracy, and pollution. Chinese complained of pollution, reverse culture shock, inferior education for children, frustration with government bureaucracy, and the quality of health care. Returnees said they were generally making less money in absolute terms, but they also said they enjoyed a higher quality of life.

We may not need all these workers in the U.S. during the deepening recession. But we will need them to help us recover from it. Right now, they are taking their skills and ideas back to their home countries and are unlikely to return, barring an extraordinary recruitment effort and major changes to immigration policy. That hardly seems likely given the current political climate. The policy focus now seems to be on doing whatever it takes to retain existing American jobs — even if it comes at the cost of building a workforce for the future of America.

 

February 28, 2009

How to save some Money

Filed under: Carson Politics, National, Nevada — Joe Eiben @ 4:30 am

 When a company falls on difficult times, one of the things that seems to happen is they reduce their staff and workers.  The remaining workers need to find ways to continue to do a good job or risk that their job would be eliminated as well.  Wall Street, and the media normally congratulate the CEO for making this type of “tough decision”, and his board of directors gives him a big bonus.

Our government should not be immune from similar risks.

Therefore: Reduce the House of Representatives from the current 435 members to 218 members and Senate members from 100 to 50 (one per State). Also reduce remaining staff by 25%.

Accomplish this over the next 8 years. (two steps / two elections) and of course this would require some redistricting.

Some Yearly Monetary Gains Include:

$44,108,400 for elimination of base pay for congress. (267 members X $165,200 pay / member / yr.)

$97,175,000 for elimination of the above people’s staff. (estimate $1.3 Million in staff per each member of the House, and $3 Million in staff per each member of the Senate every year)

$240,294 for the reduction in remaining staff by 25%.

$7,500,000,000 reduction in pork barrel ear-marks each year. (those members whose jobs are gone. Current estimates for total government pork earmarks are at $15 Billion / yr)

The remaining representatives would need to work smarter and would need to improve efficiencies.  It might even be in their best interests to work together for the good of our country?

We may also expect that smaller committees might lead to a more efficient resolution of issues as well.  It might even be easier to keep track of what your representative is doing.

Congress has more tools available to do their jobs than it had back in 1911 when the current number of representatives was established.  (telephone, computers, cell phones to name a few)

Note:
Congress did not hesitate to head home when it was a holiday, when the nation needed a real fix to the economic problems.  Also, we have 3 senators that have not been doing their jobs for the past 18+ months (on the campaign trail) and still they all have been accepting full pay.  These facts alone support a reduction in senators & congress.

Summary of opportunity:

$ 44,108,400 reduction of congress members.

$282,100, 000 for elimination of the reduced house member staff.

$150,000,000 for elimination of reduced senate member staff.

$59,675,000 for 25% reduction of staff for remaining house members.

$37,500,000 for 25% reduction of staff for remaining senate members.

$7,500,000,000 reduction in pork added to bills by the reduction of congress members.

$8,073,383,400 per year, estimated total savings. (that’s 8-BILLION just to start!)

Big business does these types of cuts all the time.

If Congresspersons were required to serve 20, 25 or 30 years (like everyone else) in order to collect retirement benefits there is no telling how much we would save. Now they get full retirement after serving only ONE term. 

IF you are happy how the Congress spends our taxes, then just delete this message. IF you are NOT at all happy, then I assume you know what to do.

February 23, 2009

What is true!?

Filed under: Carson Politics, National, Nevada — Joe Eiben @ 6:44 am

Who can you believe; who can you trust; where can you find the truth?

It is well known an eye witness to most events only remembers a sparse account of what really happened. Our back ground, life style, memories, friends and more cloud our ability to know what we see, hear nd even feel is the truth. Have you ever felt a creature crawling on your arm to look (sorry it really is not there) and see nothing. Was it a breeze a nerve or did it leave before you looked?

Our world today is colored by the “media” that you listen to the most. Be your preference be on line, the TV, radio, talk radio, or friends. Yes, you trust your sources of information may be correct or probably as colored as the one I listen/watch. So, what are we to do? Get involved and watch more then listen. We learn more about people from their actions then we do from what they say. Watch watch watch

Next Page »

Powered by WordPress