<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sorry to Ruin the Fun</title>
	<link>http://conservablogs.com/Laissez-faire/2008/04/27/sorry-to-ruin-the-fun/</link>
	<description>*** A mix of serious &#038; humorous thoughts, jabs &#038; criticism of all things political from a Goldwater conservative / libertarian perspective ***</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 12:44:21 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Smitty</title>
		<link>http://conservablogs.com/Laissez-faire/2008/04/27/sorry-to-ruin-the-fun/#comment-6156</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 10:26:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://conservablogs.com/Laissez-faire/2008/04/27/sorry-to-ruin-the-fun/#comment-6156</guid>
					<description>Don't confuse me with Al Gore, he's the one who "rants."  The Little Ice Age is a historical "fact" beyond dispute and sunspot observations have been remarkably accurate and detailed since Galileo made them in the early 1600's (http://galileo.rice.edu/sci/observations/sunspot_drawings.html).

The observation of sunspot activity in the 17th century corresponded with a period of bitter cold that began around 1650 and lasted, with intermittent spikes of warming, until 1715.  Frigid winters and cold summers during that period led to massive crop failures, famine and death in Northern Europe (INVESTOR'S BUSINESS DAILY 2/7/2008).

Historical observations of sunspot activity by scientists such as Galileo are likely more reliable than the temperature findings reported by numerous faceless, individuals used by advocates of Global Warming.

The fact that "Global Warming" peaked in 1998 and has since leveled off or even partially declined is not "wishful thinking."  The climate is always in flux and humanity has always prospered during warm climes and always suffered during cold ones.  So we should all "hope" that that it is global warming, not cooling that is headed our way.  But "hoping" will not change anything.
******************************
"Overlooked by Gore, et al, is the fact that epochs with
high-amplitude sunspot cycles coincide with warm climates,
low-amplitude cycles with cold climates. In the 16th century there
were hardly any sunspots (the 'Maunder Minimum'), perhaps none
at all, heralding the 'little ice age.' In the 19th century there
was another relative minimum of sunspot activity, coinciding with
the Irish potato famine caused by miserable summer weather. With
the subsequent increase in sunspot activity, the climate began to
warm. Meanwhile, NASA reports that the south-polar ice cap on Mars
shows signs of shrinking beyond the expected seasonal cycle. We
only have two vehicles up there, and they are not even running on
gasoline. Perhaps the green Martians have hidden all their SUVs
on the other side of that planet. Draw your own conclusions on
global warming!" ---Emeritus Professor of Atmospheric Science,
Austrian Academy of Science (http://archive.patriotpost.us/pub/06-26_Brief/page-4.php)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t confuse me with Al Gore, he&#8217;s the one who &#8220;rants.&#8221;  The Little Ice Age is a historical &#8220;fact&#8221; beyond dispute and sunspot observations have been remarkably accurate and detailed since Galileo made them in the early 1600&#8217;s (http://galileo.rice.edu/sci/observations/sunspot_drawings.html).</p>
<p>The observation of sunspot activity in the 17th century corresponded with a period of bitter cold that began around 1650 and lasted, with intermittent spikes of warming, until 1715.  Frigid winters and cold summers during that period led to massive crop failures, famine and death in Northern Europe (INVESTOR&#8217;S BUSINESS DAILY 2/7/2008).</p>
<p>Historical observations of sunspot activity by scientists such as Galileo are likely more reliable than the temperature findings reported by numerous faceless, individuals used by advocates of Global Warming.</p>
<p>The fact that &#8220;Global Warming&#8221; peaked in 1998 and has since leveled off or even partially declined is not &#8220;wishful thinking.&#8221;  The climate is always in flux and humanity has always prospered during warm climes and always suffered during cold ones.  So we should all &#8220;hope&#8221; that that it is global warming, not cooling that is headed our way.  But &#8220;hoping&#8221; will not change anything.<br />
******************************<br />
&#8220;Overlooked by Gore, et al, is the fact that epochs with<br />
high-amplitude sunspot cycles coincide with warm climates,<br />
low-amplitude cycles with cold climates. In the 16th century there<br />
were hardly any sunspots (the &#8216;Maunder Minimum&#8217;), perhaps none<br />
at all, heralding the &#8216;little ice age.&#8217; In the 19th century there<br />
was another relative minimum of sunspot activity, coinciding with<br />
the Irish potato famine caused by miserable summer weather. With<br />
the subsequent increase in sunspot activity, the climate began to<br />
warm. Meanwhile, NASA reports that the south-polar ice cap on Mars<br />
shows signs of shrinking beyond the expected seasonal cycle. We<br />
only have two vehicles up there, and they are not even running on<br />
gasoline. Perhaps the green Martians have hidden all their SUVs<br />
on the other side of that planet. Draw your own conclusions on<br />
global warming!&#8221; &#8212;Emeritus Professor of Atmospheric Science,<br />
Austrian Academy of Science (http://archive.patriotpost.us/pub/06-26_Brief/page-4.php)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: NeilG</title>
		<link>http://conservablogs.com/Laissez-faire/2008/04/27/sorry-to-ruin-the-fun/#comment-6143</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 04:26:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://conservablogs.com/Laissez-faire/2008/04/27/sorry-to-ruin-the-fun/#comment-6143</guid>
					<description>You should at least consider including some facts in your rant.  I have read it twice and can find nothing but wishful thinking.  An ice age based on a lack of sun spots?  Where is there any kind of proven link?  The link you want to believe is not generally accepted because the link is based on  apparently poor observation of the suns activity centuries ago when sun observations were poor at best.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You should at least consider including some facts in your rant.  I have read it twice and can find nothing but wishful thinking.  An ice age based on a lack of sun spots?  Where is there any kind of proven link?  The link you want to believe is not generally accepted because the link is based on  apparently poor observation of the suns activity centuries ago when sun observations were poor at best.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
