<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cemetery of the Innocents</title>
	<link>http://conservablogs.com/haemet/2006/11/14/cemetery-of-the-innocents/</link>
	<description>The Truth Will Set You Free- John 8:32</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 15:57:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: <![CDATA[American Idol Winner Jordin Sparks a Pro-Life Advocate &#171; Haemet Yeshachrer Otcha]]></title>
		<link>http://conservablogs.com/haemet/2006/11/14/cemetery-of-the-innocents/#comment-72</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[American Idol Winner Jordin Sparks a Pro-Life Advocate &#171; Haemet Yeshachrer Otcha]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2007 03:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://conservablogs.com/haemet/2006/11/14/cemetery-of-the-innocents/#comment-72</guid>
		<description>[...] reminds me of when the angry feminist was screaming at us during Cemetery of the Innocents. I thinks she said something like, &#8220;You guys go to Cornell? I thought all the women here were [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] reminds me of when the angry feminist was screaming at us during Cemetery of the Innocents. I thinks she said something like, &#8220;You guys go to Cornell? I thought all the women here were [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: <![CDATA[I Just Don&#8217;t Understand Them&#8230; &#171; Political Cowboy]]></title>
		<link>http://conservablogs.com/haemet/2006/11/14/cemetery-of-the-innocents/#comment-71</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[I Just Don&#8217;t Understand Them&#8230; &#171; Political Cowboy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 22:17:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://conservablogs.com/haemet/2006/11/14/cemetery-of-the-innocents/#comment-71</guid>
		<description>[...] A while back, Tieki Rae posted some thoughts on a pro-life demonstration she helped arrange. From the pictures and comments, she did a great job. Of course there was interesting interaction with a pro-abortionist. Note the contrast in the attitudes of the two parties involved. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] A while back, Tieki Rae posted some thoughts on a pro-life demonstration she helped arrange. From the pictures and comments, she did a great job. Of course there was interesting interaction with a pro-abortionist. Note the contrast in the attitudes of the two parties involved. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: <![CDATA[robbie]]></title>
		<link>http://conservablogs.com/haemet/2006/11/14/cemetery-of-the-innocents/#comment-69</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[robbie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2006 00:28:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://conservablogs.com/haemet/2006/11/14/cemetery-of-the-innocents/#comment-69</guid>
		<description>i understand all points here but the main issue is if not for termanation our life could not survive...the way we no it. poverty is not nice

robbie</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i understand all points here but the main issue is if not for termanation our life could not survive&#8230;the way we no it. poverty is not nice</p>
<p>robbie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: <![CDATA[wytammic]]></title>
		<link>http://conservablogs.com/haemet/2006/11/14/cemetery-of-the-innocents/#comment-70</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[wytammic]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Nov 2006 14:57:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://conservablogs.com/haemet/2006/11/14/cemetery-of-the-innocents/#comment-70</guid>
		<description>You guys did a great job. It appears the display was very though provoking on your campus. Thanks for taking time to speak for those who have no voice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You guys did a great job. It appears the display was very though provoking on your campus. Thanks for taking time to speak for those who have no voice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: <![CDATA[Scott]]></title>
		<link>http://conservablogs.com/haemet/2006/11/14/cemetery-of-the-innocents/#comment-68</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 15:45:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://conservablogs.com/haemet/2006/11/14/cemetery-of-the-innocents/#comment-68</guid>
		<description>Why the majority pro-abortionists should be unappealing to &lt;i&gt;anyone&lt;/i&gt;: They cannot approach the opposing side (the majority pro-lifers) with compassion.

Pro-lifers can approach "the other side" in a way that says "I care for you and your child."

As illustrated by the SAGE/CCFL confrontation, the pro-aborts can only approach in a way that says "I care for me and me alone" which can be loosely translated "I want to be able to have an abortion to hide that I can't control my hormones and resulting unwise actions"

As far as the health clause of most abortion laws, I would say save the life that can be saved. If both Mom and Baby are going to die, the life that can be saved should be saved.

If the mother has a health problem that &lt;b&gt;does not&lt;/b&gt; threaten her life or the life of the baby, abortion would not be acceptable.

If Mom has a fast spreading uterine cancer early on in the pregnancy, she needs to be treated for it and the baby will likely not survive. There are other cases late in pregnancy where the baby might survive and the mother not.

A consistent pro-lifer says save the life that can be saved (see Randy Alcorn's Why Pro-Life?, Multnomah Pub., 2004, pp. 76-77).

Studies show that two fertile, consenting adults  will have only a 3% chance at best of conception. Factors in rape or incest further decrease these chances (Alcorn, p. 78). What an amazing function God has placed in the human body!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why the majority pro-abortionists should be unappealing to <i>anyone</i>: They cannot approach the opposing side (the majority pro-lifers) with compassion.</p>
<p>Pro-lifers can approach &#8220;the other side&#8221; in a way that says &#8220;I care for you and your child.&#8221;</p>
<p>As illustrated by the SAGE/CCFL confrontation, the pro-aborts can only approach in a way that says &#8220;I care for me and me alone&#8221; which can be loosely translated &#8220;I want to be able to have an abortion to hide that I can&#8217;t control my hormones and resulting unwise actions&#8221;</p>
<p>As far as the health clause of most abortion laws, I would say save the life that can be saved. If both Mom and Baby are going to die, the life that can be saved should be saved.</p>
<p>If the mother has a health problem that <b>does not</b> threaten her life or the life of the baby, abortion would not be acceptable.</p>
<p>If Mom has a fast spreading uterine cancer early on in the pregnancy, she needs to be treated for it and the baby will likely not survive. There are other cases late in pregnancy where the baby might survive and the mother not.</p>
<p>A consistent pro-lifer says save the life that can be saved (see Randy Alcorn&#8217;s Why Pro-Life?, Multnomah Pub., 2004, pp. 76-77).</p>
<p>Studies show that two fertile, consenting adults  will have only a 3% chance at best of conception. Factors in rape or incest further decrease these chances (Alcorn, p. 78). What an amazing function God has placed in the human body!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: <![CDATA[Kevin]]></title>
		<link>http://conservablogs.com/haemet/2006/11/14/cemetery-of-the-innocents/#comment-67</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 12:05:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://conservablogs.com/haemet/2006/11/14/cemetery-of-the-innocents/#comment-67</guid>
		<description>Haha I was trying to read that sign the lady was holding up and thinking, "Boy, the Cornell Coalition for Life makes horrible protest posters!"  It took a while to realize that it was a poster for the other side :).

Quite possibly the most difficult sign to read ever.  The first thing I read was "These people raped incest not."

Ausblog, You say, "I’d like to see effective birth control made available to all who can’t afford it."  Good point.  I believe there is a shot that you can get that makes you sterile for 3 or 6 months.  It's free to anyone who wants it in Dallas, and probably elsewhere.  I just googled "free birth control" and the first link says anyone in Washington state can get it free as well.  Someone needs to get the word out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha I was trying to read that sign the lady was holding up and thinking, &#8220;Boy, the Cornell Coalition for Life makes horrible protest posters!&#8221;  It took a while to realize that it was a poster for the other side :).</p>
<p>Quite possibly the most difficult sign to read ever.  The first thing I read was &#8220;These people raped incest not.&#8221;</p>
<p>Ausblog, You say, &#8220;I’d like to see effective birth control made available to all who can’t afford it.&#8221;  Good point.  I believe there is a shot that you can get that makes you sterile for 3 or 6 months.  It&#8217;s free to anyone who wants it in Dallas, and probably elsewhere.  I just googled &#8220;free birth control&#8221; and the first link says anyone in Washington state can get it free as well.  Someone needs to get the word out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: <![CDATA[ausblog]]></title>
		<link>http://conservablogs.com/haemet/2006/11/14/cemetery-of-the-innocents/#comment-66</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ausblog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 03:42:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://conservablogs.com/haemet/2006/11/14/cemetery-of-the-innocents/#comment-66</guid>
		<description>World estimations of the number of terminations carried out each year is somewhere between 20 and 88 million.

3,500 per day / 1.3 million per year in America alone.

50% of that 1.3 million claimed failed birth control was to blame.

A further 48% had failed to use any birth control at all.

And 2% had medical reasons.

That means a stagering 98% may have been avoided had an effective birth control been used.




I am a 98% pro-lifer, 2% Pro-choicer, who has no religious convictions at all . I didn't need the fear of god or anything else to come to my decision, just a good sense of what is right and wrong.
You see we were all once a fetus. Is it beyond the realm of possibilities that when your mother first learned she was carrying you, she may have considered her options? What if she had decided to terminate? Would that have been OK?
You would not exist, if you have children they would not exist, and your (husband or wife) would be married to someone else. You would have been deprived of all your experiences and memories. In this day and age with terminations being so readily available and so many being carried out, if you make it to full term you can consider yourself lucky.
Lucky you had a mother that made the choice of life for you.

Don't you think they all deserve the same basic human right, LIFE?


At the point of conception is when life began for you. This was the start of your existence. Your own personal big bang. Three weeks after conception heart started to beat. First brain waves recorded at six weeks after conception. Seen sucking thumb at seven weeks after conception.

Though it pains me to say it , there may always be a need for the 2% medical reasons and such, but that's all.

So how do we get the other 98% to be responsible...................

How do we get them to be honest with themselves, about when life begins.

Everyone knows life begins at conception,   egg+sperm = human being

Sadly many prefer an occasional abortion, over using birth control, they have all kinds of reasons, each of them selfish.

Then there's the christian impossition,(all a bit talibanish), and their men in high places.(church and state should never entwine) their stance against b/c has only added to the numbers.

Sanity must provale, abortions should remain available and safe to the 2% and the rest need to have a good look at themselves and get their act together.


I'd like to see effective birth control made available to all who can't afford it.


People have to stop using abortion as birth control.............</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>World estimations of the number of terminations carried out each year is somewhere between 20 and 88 million.</p>
<p>3,500 per day / 1.3 million per year in America alone.</p>
<p>50% of that 1.3 million claimed failed birth control was to blame.</p>
<p>A further 48% had failed to use any birth control at all.</p>
<p>And 2% had medical reasons.</p>
<p>That means a stagering 98% may have been avoided had an effective birth control been used.</p>
<p>I am a 98% pro-lifer, 2% Pro-choicer, who has no religious convictions at all . I didn&#8217;t need the fear of god or anything else to come to my decision, just a good sense of what is right and wrong.<br />
You see we were all once a fetus. Is it beyond the realm of possibilities that when your mother first learned she was carrying you, she may have considered her options? What if she had decided to terminate? Would that have been OK?<br />
You would not exist, if you have children they would not exist, and your (husband or wife) would be married to someone else. You would have been deprived of all your experiences and memories. In this day and age with terminations being so readily available and so many being carried out, if you make it to full term you can consider yourself lucky.<br />
Lucky you had a mother that made the choice of life for you.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t you think they all deserve the same basic human right, LIFE?</p>
<p>At the point of conception is when life began for you. This was the start of your existence. Your own personal big bang. Three weeks after conception heart started to beat. First brain waves recorded at six weeks after conception. Seen sucking thumb at seven weeks after conception.</p>
<p>Though it pains me to say it , there may always be a need for the 2% medical reasons and such, but that&#8217;s all.</p>
<p>So how do we get the other 98% to be responsible&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
<p>How do we get them to be honest with themselves, about when life begins.</p>
<p>Everyone knows life begins at conception,   egg+sperm = human being</p>
<p>Sadly many prefer an occasional abortion, over using birth control, they have all kinds of reasons, each of them selfish.</p>
<p>Then there&#8217;s the christian impossition,(all a bit talibanish), and their men in high places.(church and state should never entwine) their stance against b/c has only added to the numbers.</p>
<p>Sanity must provale, abortions should remain available and safe to the 2% and the rest need to have a good look at themselves and get their act together.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d like to see effective birth control made available to all who can&#8217;t afford it.</p>
<p>People have to stop using abortion as birth control&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
