Archive for February, 2007

If this doesn’t spell “End Times”…

Then I don’t know what does.

Present-day Sanhedrin court seeks to revive ancient Temple rituals

The present-day Sanhedrin Court decided Tuesday to purchase a herd of sheep for ritual sacrifice at the site of the Temple on the eve of Passover, conditions on the Temple Mount permitting.

The modern Sanhedrin was established several years ago and is headed by Rabbi Adin Steinsaltz. It claims to be renewing the ancient Jewish high court, which existed until roughly 1600 years ago, and meets once a week.

Professor Hillel Weiss, a member of the Sanhedrin, told Haaretz on Tuesday that the action, even if merely symbolic, is designed to demonstrate in a way that is obvious to all that the expectation of Temple rituals will resume is real, and not just talk.

I always wondered how Jews justified being Jews without performing all of the sacrifices and rituals mentioned in the Old Testament. Turns out they have a lot of rabbinic laws and traditions established after the Old Testament that exempts them from such. However, it would appear that the movement to return to the Biblical laws is growing.

Sphere: Related Content

Well, Mr. Guiliani, I “never liked” you.

There are a couple very interesting articles about Rudy Guiliani’s presidential ambitions over at Lifenews.com.

First: “Rudy Guiliani Says He’s Running for President, Abortion a Turnoff

Rudy Giuliani falls squarely in the pro-abortion camp, though he’s been trying to reassure pro-life voters lately he’s not that bad.

During the CNN interview, he tried to play down his pro-abortion views.

“I am pro-choice, but I am also, as you know, against abortion. Hate abortion. Never liked it,” Giuliani said.

He indicated he thought GOP voters could support him based on other issues.

“There is understanding that you can’t find a candidate you agree with 100 percent of the time,” Giuliani said. “I think they will vote for a candidate based on leadership.”

That was such selected emphasis on my part. I mean, the entire article could be emphasized. To address his last point first, I do not care how well he handled September 11, 2001. It’s over. And I’m not trying to sound crass by saying that. But I feel like we have grown as a country and moved on to slightly more important tasks - such as preventing terrorism rather than dealing with it as it happens. I’ll repeat what I have said before, “America’s Mayor” is not my mayor and he will never be my president.

Now, onto his completely illogical views concerning abortion. Unfortunately, many people hold the same views: “Oh, me? I hate abortion. Terrible stuff. But you know, who am I to impose that on someone else?” I just have one question for those people: Why do you hate abortion? Seriously, what is so wrong with it that you would “hate” it? Yet, what is so right about it that it should still be legal, given the fact that you hate it?

I’ll be a bit presumptuous and answer my own question. People hate abortion because it disgusts them. Deep inside, they recognize that there is something inherently wrong with ending a pregnancy and murdering an unborn child. It is not good for the child, it is not good for the mother, and it is definitely not good for society. It inspires hatred. Whereas this hatred motivates some individuals to fight and speak out against abortion, there are other spineless people that would rather not go through the trouble. Spineless Person #1: Rudy Guiliani. (And that’s assuming that he truly hates abortion.)

The funny thing is, Guiliani really thinks that Republicans will vote for him even though he is radically pro-choice. Here’s where the second article comes into play: “Some GOP Voters Wrongly Think Rudy Guiliani is Pro-Life on Abortion

A new Fox News poll released yesterday finds that only 42 percent of GOP voters correctly identified Giuliani as pro-abortion. Some 21 percent say he’s pro-life and another 36 percent don’t know where he stands.

Giuliani’s high poll numbers will likely drop once more voters find out he supports abortion.

That’s because the poll showed 46 percent of GOP voters are less likely to support a pro-abortion candidate — with 36% a lot less likely and 10 percent somewhat less likely. Only 22 percent are more likely to support an abortion advocate.

That means nearly half of the people who will make the decision at the ballot box in early 2008 as to who will represent the Republican Party in the next election will be less inclined to back Giuliani and about 60 percent of GOP voters have yet to find out that he supports abortion.

Those numbers could be why Giuliani has been soft-peddling his pro-abortion stance in recent media interviews.

During a CNN interview this week where he said he was definitely running for president, he tried to play down his pro-abortion views.

“I am pro-choice, but I am also, as you know, against abortion. Hate abortion. Never liked it,” Giuliani said.

I just had to keep the “hate abortion” quote again. It’s priceless, really. But I hope that the analysis here is correct, that GOP voters really don’t know how pro-abortion Guiliani really is. That would make sense, given that I firmly believe there is no possibility of a pro-choice Republican winning the presidency. I guess we will see.

For now, I suppose we will let Guiliani go on not liking abortion, yet doing nothing about it. I, on the other hand, will go on not liking Guiliani and doing my darndest to tell everyone about it.

Sphere: Related Content

Mitt Romney: Off the List

Before I discovered this at studentsforbrownback.org, Mitt Romney was still on my maybe list for presidential candidates in ‘08. I am not a big fan because he used to be pro-choice and now is suddenly pro-life as we approach the 2008 elections. In all fairness, it isn’t up to me to decide whether or not he is really pro-life, he simply isn’t pro-life enough for me.

Mitt Romney Refuses to Support a Human Life Amendment to the Constitution:

As a reader pointed out in an earlier post, while Mitt Romney is anti-Roe, he certainly is not pro-life. By refusing to support a Human Life Amendment to the Constitution, Romney is rejecting one of the key planks in the platform of the Republican Party that has been there since 1980. Furthermore, he finds himself to the left on life issues of even Sen. John McCain, who supports such an amendment.

Here is the actual text of Mitt Romney’s published Q&A in the Feb. 10th issue of National Journal:

NJ: You would favor a constitutional amendment banning abortion with exceptions for the life of the mother, rape and incest. Is that correct?

What I’ve indicated is that I am pro-life, and that my hope is that the Supreme Court will give to the states over time or give to the states soon or give to the states their own ability to make their own decisions with regard to their own abortion law.

NJ: If a state wanted unlimited abortion?

The state would fall into restrictions that had been imposed at the federal level, so they couldn’t be more expansive in abortion than currently exists under the law, but they could become more restrictive in abortion provisions. So states like Massachusetts could stay like they are if they so desire, and states that have a different view could take that course. And it would be up to the citizens of the individual states. My view is not to impose a single federal rule on the entire nation — a one-size-fits-all approach — but instead allow states to make their own decisions in this regard.

Could it be any clearer? If you are actually committed to ending the destruction of human life in womb, Mitt Romney is not your man — he is not willing to support what needs to be done to make it happen. Don’t let ignorant “pro-life” sellouts tell you otherwise.

And there you have it. Another one bites the dust.

Sphere: Related Content

“The politics of the man behind ‘24′”

Beautiful.

I discovered this last night on Drudge and it pretty much made my day. I’ve always known that even with the liberal plot twists of 24, there must be a conservative behind the whole thing merely tossing a few bones to the dems. I was so right.

During three decades as a journeyman screenwriter, Surnow grew increasingly conservative. He “hated welfare,” which he saw as government handouts. Liberal courts also angered him. He loved Ronald Reagan’s “strength” and disdained Jimmy Carter’s “belief that people would be nice to us just because we were humane. That never works.” He said of Reagan, “I can hardly think of him without breaking into tears. I just felt Ronald Reagan was the father that this country needed. . . . He made me feel good that I was in his family.”

Surnow said that he found the Clinton years obnoxious. “Hollywood under Clinton—it was like he was their guy,” he said. “He was the yuppie, baby-boomer narcissist that all of Hollywood related to.” During those years, Surnow recalled, he had countless arguments with liberal colleagues, some of whom stopped speaking to him. “My feeling is that the liberals’ ideas are wrong,” he said. “But they think I’m evil.” Last year, he contributed two thousand dollars to the losing campaign of Pennsylvania’s hard-line Republican senator Rick Santorum, because he “liked his position on immigration.” His favorite bumper sticker, he said, is “Except for Ending Slavery, Fascism, Nazism & Communism, War Has Never Solved Anything.”

The article itself is a little wishy-washy and whines about the way torture is portrayed on 24 — what do you expect from the New Yorker? — but the actual story of Joel Surnow (co-creator and executive producer) is simply beautiful. He is friends with Rush Limbaugh. He calls Bill Clinton a yuppie. He donated to Rick Santorum’s campaign. He believes torture works. He wants to make a pro-McCarthy movie with his friend Ann Coulter… and the list goes on. Honestly, does it get any better than that?

It just makes me happy inside to know that one of the most popular shows on TV comes from what could be the most conservative man in Hollywood. The lefties must simply love that.

Surnow, for his part, revels in his minority status inside the left-leaning entertainment industry. “Conservatives are the new oppressed class,” he joked in his office. “Isn’t it bizarre that in Hollywood it’s easier to come out as gay than as conservative?” His success with “24,” he said, has protected him from the more righteous elements of the Hollywood establishment. “Right now, they have to be nice to me,” he said. “But if the show tanks I’m sure they’ll kill me.”

Besides the fact that he gets to work with Kiefer Sutherland, I definitely do not envy his job - having to put up with all the Hollywood shenanigans and being surrounded by silly liberals pretty much all the time.

…Okay, wait. What am I saying? I would put up with anything to work with Kiefer Sutherland.

Sphere: Related Content

Kidnapped Israeli Soldiers

It has been nearly 7 months since three Israeli soldiers were kidnapped by Hamas and Hezbollah - right before the war between Israel and Hezbollah last summer. There has been minimal communication from the Hamas abductee in the form of a letter and minor negotiations. There has been no communication from Hezbollah concerning their two abductees.

I was privileged to hear Karnit Goldwasser, wife of abductee Ehud Goldwasser, come speak at Cornell this afternoon in between appointments with Sen. Clinton and UN Secretary-General Ban Ki Moon. Her story about her husband’s kidnapping on July 12, 2006 is amazing and horrifying at the same time.

At the time of Ehud’s kidnapping, they had only been married 10 months. It was Ehud’s last day of his reserve service for the year and she was preparing a special dinner for him when she heard about the kidnapping. She did not get to celebrate his birthday with him or their first anniversary. She has has no idea where he is being held, if he is hurt or has received medical attention, or even if he is alive.

Her strength and determination in telling her story to not only various speaking audiences but also the most prominent political leaders in the world astounds me. The story that she tells horrifies me. I cannot even comprehend why this is not a front page story every day. I do not understand why the leaders of the free world (a.k.a. the US and company) are not putting extreme amounts of pressure on Lebanon and Hezbollah to return these Israeli soldiers. I am sure that if they were American soldiers, or European, or any other nationality in the world, this would not be tolerated. But is the anti-Israeli worldview truly so prevalent that we are willing to forget three men who were kidnapped simply while monitoring the border?

It appears that Congress is starting to get the picture, thanks to Karnit. I was going to try to quote a part of this JPost article from Jan. 31, but really, you’ve got to read the whole thing:

Several US House members from both sides of the aisle have joined together to sponsor a bill demanding the release of three IDF soldiers kidnapped this summer by Hizbullah and Hamas.

Bill author Gary Ackerman (D-NY) acknowledged that the resolution, even once it passed, would not have the authority to force the release of captives Gilad Shalit, Ehud Goldwasser and Eldad Regev.

“While we cannot compel these parties to release Gilad, Ehud, and Eldad any more than we can force them to understand the difference between right and wrong,” he said, “we can stand by our ally the state of Israel, we can express our sympathy for the captives and their families, we can let the perpetrators of this barbarism know that we have not forgotten what they have done.”

Ackerman also blasted Syria and Iran for their role in sponsoring the terror organizations, something that was echoed by the other representatives who joined him at a press conference on Capitol Hill Tuesday afternoon.

Israel’s ambassadors to Washington and the UN were also present, as was Ehud Goldwasser’s wife, Karnit.

She said that actions such as the resolution have significance because of the message they send, both to the perpetrators and to the European Union, where - she said - some parliamentarians were now working on a similar resolution.

“The United States is helping us,” she said after the press conference. “It shows Nasrallah that he’s not dealing with the Goldwasser, Shalit, or Regev family. He’s dealing with the whole free world which wants them to come home.”

Goldwasser said the American Jewish community was also playing a key role in raising awareness and providing moral support, and she praised Congress for taking action.

“Please don’t stop raising your voice. For us, it means the world,” she said.

Personally, I think it is absolute bullcrap that Ackerman thinks “we cannot compel [Lebanon, Hezbollah, and Hamas] to release Gilad, Ehud, and Eldad.” I am almost positive that the US has the diplomatic power and knowledge to place pressure where pressure needs placed. I know that I am going to write my representative and senators concerning this matter, and I strongly encourage you to do the same. Especially in a state like Wyoming where we have a relatively low Jewish population and I’m not sure our representatives get lobbied frequently enough about this issue. There is no excuse for the United States not taking a strong and determined stance and working as hard as possible to get these soldiers home.

Check out that first link to the kidnapped soldiers’ families’ webpage and also this link from the Israeli Foreign Affairs Ministry. Please, I can’t encourage you enough to contact your congressional representation about these men. Imagine if they were your family members, if they were American soldiers, being held by a terrorist organization for 7 months with out any contact with the outside world and with little to no media coverage or international political pressure. It is truly inexcusable.

Sphere: Related Content

“crazy conservative religious articulate”

There is a little spot on the Blog Stats page that says, “Search Engine Terms” and “These are the terms people used to find your blog.” You know the one I’m talking about? Well, apparently, “crazy conservative religious articulate” was searched and someone subsequently clicked my blog not once, not twice, not even thrice, but um… four times.

Haha, makes me laugh. I guess I’ve been called worse! =-D

Sphere: Related Content