<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mitt Romney:  Off the List</title>
	<link>http://conservablogs.com/haemet/2007/02/11/mitt-romney-off-the-list/</link>
	<description>The Truth Will Set You Free- John 8:32</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 13:26:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Wyoming Vote Tracker &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Romney Pushes Values in JH</title>
		<link>http://conservablogs.com/haemet/2007/02/11/mitt-romney-off-the-list/#comment-751</link>
		<dc:creator>Wyoming Vote Tracker &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Romney Pushes Values in JH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 08:06:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://conservablogs.com/haemet/2007/02/11/mitt-romney-off-the-list/#comment-751</guid>
		<description>[...] good quotes, but still, his semi-pro-life stance concerns me. However, he does like WYGOP&#8217;s caucus move: Romney said Wyoming will have a disproportionate [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] good quotes, but still, his semi-pro-life stance concerns me. However, he does like WYGOP&#8217;s caucus move: Romney said Wyoming will have a disproportionate [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: <![CDATA[theobromophile]]></title>
		<link>http://conservablogs.com/haemet/2007/02/11/mitt-romney-off-the-list/#comment-130</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[theobromophile]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 20:29:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://conservablogs.com/haemet/2007/02/11/mitt-romney-off-the-list/#comment-130</guid>
		<description>"Only if it looks like he can carry that fruity state of CA. No offense to the conservatives there — are there any?"

Hi, Tammi! :p

As a die-hard federalist, I'm afraid that I have to agree with Mr. Romney on this one.  Regulation of health, safety, and welfare (i.e. medicine &#38; crime) are quintessential state functions, and I don't like them being regulated on the federal level.  On a very pragmatic level, state regulation will make this less of a federal/political issue.  If a human life amendment passes, pro-choicers will waste no time trying to overturn it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Only if it looks like he can carry that fruity state of CA. No offense to the conservatives there — are there any?&#8221;</p>
<p>Hi, Tammi! :p</p>
<p>As a die-hard federalist, I&#8217;m afraid that I have to agree with Mr. Romney on this one.  Regulation of health, safety, and welfare (i.e. medicine &amp; crime) are quintessential state functions, and I don&#8217;t like them being regulated on the federal level.  On a very pragmatic level, state regulation will make this less of a federal/political issue.  If a human life amendment passes, pro-choicers will waste no time trying to overturn it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: <![CDATA[Kevin]]></title>
		<link>http://conservablogs.com/haemet/2007/02/11/mitt-romney-off-the-list/#comment-129</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 23:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://conservablogs.com/haemet/2007/02/11/mitt-romney-off-the-list/#comment-129</guid>
		<description>I'm not a big fan of Romney, but support for a Human Life Amendment at this point is meaningless.  You can't get 66% of Congress to go for it, and I doubt 38 states would pass it either.

Being anti-Roe is all that would make a difference.  Getting rid of that piece of garbage decision would allow states to make up their own minds, so at least some abortions would be curbed.  None would be curbed by a President who supported the Human Life Amendment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not a big fan of Romney, but support for a Human Life Amendment at this point is meaningless.  You can&#8217;t get 66% of Congress to go for it, and I doubt 38 states would pass it either.</p>
<p>Being anti-Roe is all that would make a difference.  Getting rid of that piece of garbage decision would allow states to make up their own minds, so at least some abortions would be curbed.  None would be curbed by a President who supported the Human Life Amendment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: <![CDATA[Scott]]></title>
		<link>http://conservablogs.com/haemet/2007/02/11/mitt-romney-off-the-list/#comment-128</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 20:36:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://conservablogs.com/haemet/2007/02/11/mitt-romney-off-the-list/#comment-128</guid>
		<description>That brings up an interesting question: Is it possible for a conservative Californian to pull the wool over the eyes of liberal Kahleeforneeuns?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That brings up an interesting question: Is it possible for a conservative Californian to pull the wool over the eyes of liberal Kahleeforneeuns?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: <![CDATA[wytammic]]></title>
		<link>http://conservablogs.com/haemet/2007/02/11/mitt-romney-off-the-list/#comment-127</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[wytammic]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 14:04:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://conservablogs.com/haemet/2007/02/11/mitt-romney-off-the-list/#comment-127</guid>
		<description>Sticking with Brownback here. I might switch to "Duncan Hines" if he appears more electable and I learn more about him. Only if it looks like he can carry that fruity state of CA. No offense to the conservatives there -- are there any?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sticking with Brownback here. I might switch to &#8220;Duncan Hines&#8221; if he appears more electable and I learn more about him. Only if it looks like he can carry that fruity state of CA. No offense to the conservatives there &#8212; are there any?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: <![CDATA[Scott]]></title>
		<link>http://conservablogs.com/haemet/2007/02/11/mitt-romney-off-the-list/#comment-126</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 00:06:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://conservablogs.com/haemet/2007/02/11/mitt-romney-off-the-list/#comment-126</guid>
		<description>Thanks for pointing this out.

And so passes a candidate off of my "maybe" list as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for pointing this out.</p>
<p>And so passes a candidate off of my &#8220;maybe&#8221; list as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
