After being in Colorado for a few days for my dad’s checkup, I have a ton of news and blogs to catch up on! I actually couldn’t decide what to blog about between the following headlines from Ynet, so I’m putting them all here. 
Sometimes, I wonder if good ole’ Ahmadinejad can really get any more dense. Then he pulls a move like this.
“The arrogant superpowers and the Zionist regime invested all their efforts during the 33-day war, but after 60 years, their pride has been trampled and the countdown to the destruction of this regime has been started by Hizbullah fighters…”
Honestly, how many times does he think he can spout his annihilative babblings without a military reaction from Israel?
I am really not sure what to think of this story as a whole. I have had personal experience with Super Special Screening (and more detail!), so I completely understand feeling humiliated and completely awkward, because the puffer isn’t exactly the most comfort-friendly machine. It is also a known fact that TSA agents can be blunt and rather rude — although in my limited experience with Israelis, that shouldn’t be too shocking! However, because of the background of this Israeli doctor, I can understand why she would find it harder to laugh at this situation than I did.
I guess the only questionable part of the story to me is whether or not they chose her for screening specifically because she was Israeli. It is incredibly frustrating to be standing there as men in turbans go through the line when I am a rather unsuspicious-looking college student (imho), but it doesn’t seem unreasonable that foreigners should often get special screening, regardless of their specific nationality. Furthermore, as an Israeli, shouldn’t she recognize the security measures necessary to prevent terrorism? Boo. Boo to SSS, boo to possible discrimination, and boo to freaking terrorism.
1. Yes, Bush did neglect the Israeli-Palestinian conflict to a certain extent. However, I prefer neglect to overzealous capitulation, ala Clinton.
2. I can’t decide if this is linkage (meaning all problems in the Middle East somehow relate back to Israel) or ignorance (believing that Israel would be safer with either Saddam Hussein still in power or America leaving and letting the terrorists take over Iraq).
In an essay addressing the foreign policy he plans to pursue as president, published in the Foreign Affair journal, Obama explained that “the morass in Iraq has made it immeasurably harder to confront and work through the many other problems in the region – and it has made many of those problems considerably more dangerous.
“Changing the dynamic in Iraq will allow us to focus our attention and influence on resolving the festering conflict between the Israelis and the Palestinians – a task that the Bush administration neglected for years,” he added.
Either way, both are equally dangerous and unacceptable positions for a presidential candidate - regardless of his party affiliation. I’m not sure the last time Obama talked to Olmert (the current leader of Israel, as unpopular as he may be), but practically all mainstream Israeli leaders are in favor of a continued American presence in Iraq until freedom and democracy have won and terrorism has failed. At least, that’s what Olmert said when he spoke via satellite to the AIPAC Policy Conference I attended. That’s a pretty common sense position, if you ask me.
- And finally, the bonus. Because there’s nothing better than good looks and an Israeli accent.
If it relates to Obama it has to deal with ignorance. The man can’t speak in anything more than soundbites and cliches (and the occasional bromide).
Good point, TT. Obama seems to have a “10,000 people killed by a tornado in Kansas” moment every day.
However, I believe that ignorance is a difficult front to maintain for someone who has made it so far in politics. I mean, of all the issues to attack Bush on, his policy toward Israel seems to be a weak one. After all, Bush is Israel advocates’ favorite president in years! Even if they loved Clinton’s charisma, they do realize that Bush is honestly pro-Israel. To any truly pro-Israel activist, neglect is obviously a better policy than forced negotiations with terrorists. Bush has actually started to neglect the area less and less (sending Condi over there, etc).
Congratulations on finding your blogroll! Now onto the bonus of the day ….
I think you should know, I have a major love in my heart (bordering on a fetish) for the Jews period, and for Israel in particular. I was raised by that branch of Protestant Christians (which is a lot bigger than most realize) who literally revere the Jewish people: the motto in my family is, “You don’t screw with the Jews.” You just don’t.
We know from the Bible what happens to the folks who mess with God’s Chosen People. Here’s hoping the current cuckoo Jew-haters go down in flames, as they so amply deserve.
P.S. Nice bonus. Hawt!
Oh goodness, Lewd, I’m not sure if your borderline fetish can compare to mine for the Jews. I’m specializing in Israeli history / current events in one of my majors and learning to speak Hebrew, haha. I grew up in the same sort of pro-Israel Christian background, so I know exactly what you mean.
And I’m glad you enjoyed the bonus. My mom didn’t fully appreciate the awesomeness 