Comments on: Wyoming’s Top 5 http://conservablogs.com/haemet/2007/06/19/wyomings-top-5/ The Truth Will Set You Free- John 8:32 Sat, 10 Jan 2009 00:46:54 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2 By: <![CDATA[Kevin]]> http://conservablogs.com/haemet/2007/06/19/wyomings-top-5/#comment-483 Wed, 20 Jun 2007 04:53:54 +0000 http://conservablogs.com/haemet/2007/06/19/wyomings-top-5/#comment-483 I've got you and Sunflower Desert on RSS, so don't see your updates :(... Thanks for the info, and wow, that's a good law! I’ve got you and Sunflower Desert on RSS, so don’t see your updates :(… Thanks for the info, and wow, that’s a good law!

]]> By: <![CDATA[tieki rae]]> http://conservablogs.com/haemet/2007/06/19/wyomings-top-5/#comment-482 Wed, 20 Jun 2007 03:47:38 +0000 http://conservablogs.com/haemet/2007/06/19/wyomings-top-5/#comment-482 Kevin - you should check out my updated posts. :) But yes, it is WY law that the late Senator's party nominate three candidates for consideration by the Governor and the Governor will make the final decision as to which of the three will take office. Kevin - you should check out my updated posts. :) But yes, it is WY law that the late Senator’s party nominate three candidates for consideration by the Governor and the Governor will make the final decision as to which of the three will take office.

]]> By: <![CDATA[Kevin]]> http://conservablogs.com/haemet/2007/06/19/wyomings-top-5/#comment-481 Wed, 20 Jun 2007 03:44:18 +0000 http://conservablogs.com/haemet/2007/06/19/wyomings-top-5/#comment-481 I'm for Micheli. Sansonetti and I share closer views (according to Tieki/Sunflower Desert analysis... I've found no information on the story outside the 'Wyoming Gal Syndicate'), but Micheli has the cooler name. That's got to count for something. Could you tell the uninformed (me, for example) why a Democrat Governor would appoint a Republican Senator? Is it Wyoming law that they have to replace from the original party? I’m for Micheli. Sansonetti and I share closer views (according to Tieki/Sunflower Desert analysis… I’ve found no information on the story outside the ‘Wyoming Gal Syndicate’), but Micheli has the cooler name. That’s got to count for something.

Could you tell the uninformed (me, for example) why a Democrat Governor would appoint a Republican Senator? Is it Wyoming law that they have to replace from the original party?

]]> By: <![CDATA[tieki rae]]> http://conservablogs.com/haemet/2007/06/19/wyomings-top-5/#comment-480 Wed, 20 Jun 2007 02:35:33 +0000 http://conservablogs.com/haemet/2007/06/19/wyomings-top-5/#comment-480 Steve - I'm not really sure about Mead's stance on judges. I do think he's a strict constructionist, so we'd probably be fine on the SCOTUS, but it would be incredibly important in the Senate. Consider the partial-birth abortion ban and other similar pieces of legislation. If they weren't so spineless, they could be incredibly effective. Either way, Mead didn't make it to the top 3 so we don't have to worry. :) Steve - I’m not really sure about Mead’s stance on judges. I do think he’s a strict constructionist, so we’d probably be fine on the SCOTUS, but it would be incredibly important in the Senate. Consider the partial-birth abortion ban and other similar pieces of legislation. If they weren’t so spineless, they could be incredibly effective. Either way, Mead didn’t make it to the top 3 so we don’t have to worry. :)

]]> By: <![CDATA[Next Stop Lauderdale]]> http://conservablogs.com/haemet/2007/06/19/wyomings-top-5/#comment-484 Wed, 20 Jun 2007 01:51:23 +0000 http://conservablogs.com/haemet/2007/06/19/wyomings-top-5/#comment-484 Hi tieki rae: (still doing a good job I see) "Matt Mead is doing alright, but he’s still not pro-life enough for me and I don’t think he’s strong enough to beat Micheli and company." Would he vote against a Republican President's nomination for SCOTUS that was expected to be a constructions judge (i.e. anti Roe v Wade)? Would he vote in favor of a Democratic President's nomination for SCOTUS that was expected to be a revisionist judge (i.e pro Roe v Wade)? Otherwise his personal views are irrelevant in that he has no other power in the universe of the abortion debate. Hi tieki rae: (still doing a good job I see)

“Matt Mead is doing alright, but he’s still not pro-life enough for me and I don’t think he’s strong enough to beat Micheli and company.”

Would he vote against a Republican President’s nomination for SCOTUS that was expected to be a constructions judge (i.e. anti Roe v Wade)?

Would he vote in favor of a Democratic President’s nomination for SCOTUS that was expected to be a revisionist judge (i.e pro Roe v Wade)?

Otherwise his personal views are irrelevant in that he has no other power in the universe of the abortion debate.

]]> By: <![CDATA[She’s got the Top 5 …. « Sunflower Desert]]> http://conservablogs.com/haemet/2007/06/19/wyomings-top-5/#comment-485 Tue, 19 Jun 2007 21:55:17 +0000 http://conservablogs.com/haemet/2007/06/19/wyomings-top-5/#comment-485 [...] Jun 19th, 2007 by wytammic She’s getting tired. It’s been a long day. Nevertheless, the top 5 are here. [...] […] Jun 19th, 2007 by wytammic She’s getting tired. It’s been a long day. Nevertheless, the top 5 are here. […]

]]>