Italy Investigates Botched Abortion of Healthy Twin, Disabled Brother Lives
Short version: Italian woman goes to have one of her twin boys aborted because he was diagnosed with Down Syndrome. You know, those Europeans are so modern and tolerant. Anyway, abortionist has an “oops!” moment and kills the healthy baby instead. Woman finds out, goes back in to have her second son killed, then reports the abortionist to the police.
Long version:
by Steven Ertelt
LifeNews.com Editor
August 27, 2007
Rome, Italy (LifeNews.com) — Officials in Italy are investigating a botched abortion done on twin brothers where the healthy brother became the victim of the abortion and the twin, who has Down syndrome, lived. The disabled brother was the target of the abortion procedure and the case is raising the ugly specter of abortions done to kill disabled people.The abortion was done on a 38-year-old woman in June at a hospital in Milan, but news of the mistake only recently came to the public’s attention.
Doctors at the San Paolo hospital told Italian media that the babies moved during the abortion procedure and changed position compared to their locations during a pre-abrotion examination.
According to the London Guardian, hospital officials have given the proper paperwork and information to authorities.
After doctors realized their mistake, they notified the woman in question. She returned to the hospital to have the disabled baby aborted as well and then reported the doctors to the police.
The case has caused some in the political scene to call for a review of the nation’s abortion laws.
Leftist Senator Paola Binetti wrote in the Corriere della Sera newspaper that, “The time has come to re-examine the abortion law’ that dates back to 1978.”
“What happened in this hospital was not a medical abortion but an abortion done for the purposes of eugenics,” she said. “They wanted to kill the sick fetus and save the healthy one and what didn’t work properly in this business was the selection.”
Christian Democrat politician Luca Volonte also denounced the failed abortion as “infanticide arising from a contempt for human life.”
But pro-abortion Health Minister Livia Turco defended the pro-abortion laws as “very wise” and said they should not be changed.
This is the second time that an abortion planned for a disabled baby has gone wrong.
In March, a baby boy died who became the victim of an abortion after doctors failed a disability test on him. Physicians advised his mother to have an abortion after they had misdiagnosed a physical deformity but the boy survived the procedure.
Doctors at the teaching hospital Careggi performed two ultrasounds on the boy and his mother and they said he had a defective esophagus. That’s a disorder that surgery could have corrected after birth in some cases.
However, when they went to abort the baby boy, they discovered he was healthy and desperately tried to resuscitate him.
The boy was born healthy and lived for six days following the failed abortion, which was done at 22 weeks into the pregnancy.
Italy’s abortion law allows abortions up to 24 weeks of pregnancy in certain cases but it also requires doctors to do all they can to save the life of a baby who survives a botched abortion attempt.
There are about 138,000 abortions that take place annually in the European nation.
Dang those parasitic fetuses, moving when you least expect it. It’s almost like they’re alive or something. Well, at least the woman’s “problem” was solved, right?

How tragic for both lives. What moral schizophrenia. How much clearer could the message that “we’d be better off if disabled people were dead” theme be?
I am not sure whether to laugh (because it’s so ridiculous and could not better highlight the moral cesspool that is the pro-abortion movement) or cry, because it’s not enough for this woman to have deliberately killed one child (that she presumably wanted); she had to go back to have the second child done in again.
Sickening.
Neil - You are exactly right. One thing that I’ve never been able to understand is how disability rights advocates refuse to take a stance on abortion. Sure, they’ll say that children shouldn’t be aborted simply because they’re disabled, but as long as it’s not discriminatory abortion is fine. Where is the logic in that? Why can’t they realize that abortion targets the defenseless, it discriminates based on age and size.
Bridget - Those were my thoughts exactly. It is beyond my comprehension how a woman could do that. Like you said, she presumably wanted the “healthy” baby… wouldn’t any mother in her right mind be heartbroken that her wanted child was killed and perhaps have a change of heart about the unwanted child? I don’t know. I guess post-abortive women are in stressful positions, but still… I really can’t understand it.
If only women were more informed about the possibilities of botched abortions. They happen more often than the abortion advocates would lead us to believe.
If a little justice were to be served, the abortionist would get charged with manslaughter (at the least) for killing the wrong child and the mother would realize what she had done to her children.
I am always amazed at the level of narcissism required to believe abortion can ever be justified, let alone for such petty reasons!
If they charged the woman, too, I wouldn’t shed many tears….
Yeah, it sounds heartless, but she’s like Miss “I Don’t Want to Move to Brooklyn and Buy Mayo at Costco.”
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/07/18/magazine/18LIVES.html?ex=1188619200&en=2ee8c78a56b7ab03&ei=5070