Gun-Free-Zones Fail to Stop Violence, Yet Again

Gun Free Zone

Great opinion piece over at FoxNews.com, Media Coverage of Mall Shooting Fails to Reveal Malls’ Gun-Free-Zone Status

The entire piece is worth the read. This is the same case that was made after the Virginia Tech shooting, and it is the same case that is going to be made after every senseless murder that could be prevented or stopped sooner by law-abiding, gun-carrying citizens.

There are plenty of cases every year where permit holders stop what would have been multiple victim shootings every year, but they rarely receive any news coverage. Take a case this year in Memphis, where WBIR-TV reported a gunman started “firing a pistol beside a busy city street” and was stopped by two permit holders before anyone was harmed.

When will part of the media coverage on these multiple-victim public shootings be whether guns were banned where the attack occurred? While the media has begun to cover whether teachers can have guns at school or the almost 8,000 college students across the country who protested gun-free zones on their campuses, the media haven’t started checking what are the rules where these attacks occur.

Finally, someone makes the connection the mainstream media and leftwing Brady bunch keep trying to deny:

Despite the lack of news coverage, people are beginning to notice what research has shown for years: Multiple-victim public shootings keep occurring in places where guns already are banned. Forty states have broad right-to-carry laws, but even within these states it is the “gun-free zones,” not other public places, where the attacks happen.

The law-abiding, not criminals, are obeying the rules. Disarming the victims simply means that the killers have less to fear. As Wednesday’s attack demonstrated yet again, police are important, but they almost always arrive at the crime scene after the crime has occurred.

The longer it takes for someone to arrive on the scene with a gun, the more people who will be harmed by such an attack.

Most people understand that guns deter criminals. If a killer were stalking your family, would you feel safer putting a sign out front announcing, “This Home Is a Gun-Free Zone”? But that is what the Westroads Mall did.

Someday, America is going to have to wake up. I just wonder how many more innocent people are going to have to die before people start paying attention.

protected by the 2nd amendment

3 Responses to “Gun-Free-Zones Fail to Stop Violence, Yet Again”


  1. 1 John

    gun control nuts will never acknowledge such simple common sense.

  2. 2 Sam Pierce

    Law abiding citizens obey laws.
    The shooter in the mall was not a law abiding citizen.
    The unarmed victims and bystanders were.
    Had a victim or bystander been allowed to legally have a gun on his or her person, the death toll may have been smaller.

    But what do I know?

  1. 1 Yeah, She Went There « Helvidius, a Pachyderm

Leave a Reply