Great points.

You do realise that if Sarah Palin had thrown her child out of the house, or otherwise taken action to denounce Bristol, the liberals would be saying, “That’s hypocritical and immoral!!!!!!!”

Apparently, “family values” politicians are supposed to have perfect children. Oh, wait, if that happens, they don’t understand real life and real families that face these struggles. Something tells me that the liberals are furious because the Palins are modeling a great response to teenage pregnancy. Given that Sarah gave birth while governing a state (woo-hoo!), we can assume that the Palins don’t see a lifetime of spit-up and trailers for Bristol.

No, hypocrisy is if you are pro-life until your kid gets pregnant, then you encourage and/or pay for your grandchild to be destroyed.

Consistency is choosing life, whether Bristol raises the child or has her adopted.

Consistency would be Obama wanting the unborn child to be aborted so his daughter wouldn’t be “punished” by the pregnancy.

Neil’s last blog post..Evangelism experiences 8