Archive for the 'marriage' Category

Sarah Palin - Angel Child

Over the past few days, the leftists have been having a field day in trashing Sarah Palin.  The Daily Kos claims that her four-month-old baby (born 18 April, with Down’s Syndrome) is not hers, but is her daughter’s.  Now, the Palin family has announced, publicly, that Bristol Palin is five months pregnant.  She will be marrying the baby’s father, her boyfriend, shortly.

As if the announcement of Bristol’s pregnancy were not enough to squelch the rumours about Sarah passing off her child’s baby as her own (and faking a pregnancy) - four months minus five months = negative one month, for the math-challenged), the fact remains that Trig was born with Down’s Syndrome.   A 16-year-old has a one in 2,000 chance of giving birth to a baby who has Down’s; a 42-year-old woman has a 1:57 chance of having a child with Down’s.

Math nerdishness aside, let’s examine the responses of both parties to the news of Bristol’s pregnancy.  Evangelical leaders praised the Palin family for consistently choosing life in the face of difficult circumstances.  Tom Perkins, of the Family Research Council, said

“Fortunately, Bristol is following her mother and father’s example of choosing life in the midst of a difficult situation. We are committed to praying for Bristol and her husband-to-be and the entire Palin family as they walk through a very private matter in the eyes of the public.”

Echoing this sentiment, James Dobson of Focus on the Family said:

“In the 32-year history of Focus on the Family, we have offered prayer, counseling and resource assistance to tens of thousands of parents and children in the same situation the Palins are now facing. We have always encouraged the parents to love and support their children and always advised the girls to see their pregnancies through, even though there will of course be challenges along the way. That is what the Palins are doing, and they should be commended once again for not just talking about their pro-life and pro-family values, but living them out even in the midst of trying circumstances.”

(The whole thing is worth a read.) Yet, the Left - those who style themselves as tolerant, caring, and understanding of the plights of pregnant teens - started a smear campaign against the entire Palin family that was so extreme as to prompt Barack Obama to tell the media to not involve the children of his opponents in the campaign, to call the action “not appropriate and [] not relevant,” and, in short, to kindly STFU (here). Giving kudos where kudos are due: thank you, Senator Obama, for your class, dignity, and ability to rally to a just cause, even when it is for the benefit of your political opponents.

It is difficult enough for teenagers to face any difficulty while under the constant scrutiny of their peers.  They often feel overwhelmed, wonder if their lives will ever get better, and feel as if the entire world knows about their every misdeed.  By making Bristol Palin’s pregnancy a national issue, the Left has made a national debate out of a deeply personal issue, at a difficult time for a vulnerable young lady.  Thankfully, Bristol has the support of her family, her church, and her community.

My best - and, on behalf of my fellow conserva-babe co-bloggers, our best - to the supremely awesome Palin family.  You go, Sarah Barracuda!

Update: Michelle Malkin takes on the double standards.  Choice quote: “If a Democrat mom chooses public office, she’s a patriot Wonder Woman imbued with Absolute Moral Authority on children’s, health, and social welfare issues.

“If a Republican mom chooses public office, she’s the child-neglecting spawn of Satan who has no business debating any domestic public policy because of alleged hypocrisy.”

Sphere: Related Content

Title Should Read: “American Parents Undeserving of the Name”

More food blogging:

The Washington Post reported that children are becoming more and more obese, which is leading to an unprecedented rise in health problems.  It makes this blogger sad for the kids, whose bodies are being damaged before they are even old enough to do something about it:

Doctors are seeing confirmation of this daily: boys and girls in elementary school suffering from high blood pressure, high cholesterol and painful joint conditions; a soaring incidence of type 2 diabetes, once a rarity in pediatricians’ offices; even a spike in child gallstones, also once a singularly adult affliction. Minority youth are most severely affected, because so many are pushing the scales into the most dangerous territory.

Joint conditions and high blood pressure in elementary school?  Where are the parents, you ask?

Physical therapist Brian H. Wrotniak, who works with overweight youth at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, hears resignation more than anger in his patients’ voices. “They complain of simple things like tying their shoes. They can’t bend down and tie their shoes because excess fat gets in the way,” he said.

Awww… their parents are resigned to this fate.  Who, besides the parents, is feeding these kids every day?  If your kid even starts to get too fat to tie her sneakers, then you, as a parent, need to change what you are doing.  Feed your kid oatmeal or Kashi in the morning, with a banana or an apple.  Pack her lunches every day - and if you don’t have the time to do it in the morning, do it the evening before.  Enlist her help to make the aforementioned lunches; she’s more likely to eat that which she chose to eat.  Don’t allow her to spend her money on junk food - in fact, don’t allow her to bring snack money to school.  Stop purchasing soda and junk food, so she won’t have soda or junk food in the house when she gets home from school.  It is physically impossible to eat that which is not there.  Cook healthy dinners.  Sign her up for soccer or lacrosse or swimming.  Be a parent, which generally involves allowing children to make mistakes that they can learn from, and not allowing them to make mistakes that only harm them.

What baffles me is why these doctors do not tell the parents that, unless their children get down to a healthy weight, that they will be reported for  neglect.  Not a fan of government intervention, but there is simply no reason to allow parents to do this much damage to their children’s well-being.

A final hypothesis: healthy food isn’t cheap.  Fruits and vegetables are more expensive than crackers and cookies.  Ditto for fruit juice and milk, compared to soda.  Healthy food also takes longer to prepare than junk food.  Could it possibly be that stable, two-parent households (with either double the income or double the time, or both) are better designed to provide for the well-being of their children?  that this is but one more consequence of the ethic which elevates parents above their children’?  In a post-Roe world, aren’t we supposed to only see loving, caring, dedicated parents - and ignore the fact that the rates of childhood obesity, child abuse, and other social ills has only increased since the 1970s?  Just a thought.

Sphere: Related Content

Weekly Smorgasbord

I’m in the middle of a lot of planning for the Cornell Coalition for Life (CCFL) right now. I don’t really have a lot of time to blog, but it is a good stress reliever and I feel a little guilty ignoring my blog. Sooo… I invented a weekly smorgasbord. These are a few articles that caught my eye over the week.

“Spy Jonathan Pollard caught on tape” from MSNBC

Not really sure how I feel about this one. In general, I view people who spy on America as uncool. If you get caught spying on our country, I feel that we ought to help you out and give you an inside look at the way our death penalty works. However, I love Israel almost on the same level that I love America.

Over 18 months, he stole an estimated 1 million documents, including sensitive intelligence about the Soviet Union and the Middle East, potentially compromising sources and methods.

“It devastated the national security of this country,” says Olive.

Though Pollard confessed to the crime, leaders of Israel and Pollard’s supporters in the U.S. have vigorously lobbied to get him released from prison or pardoned, arguing that he was, after all, spying for a friend of the U.S., not a sworn enemy.

Pollard was sentenced to life in prison and has served 20 years.

“He has served longer than any American in history for spying for an ally, and every day he spends in prison now is a day of injustice,” says Harvard Law professor Alan Dershowitz.

Ridiculous. Our country is full of real traitors who do far worse than spying for Israel and get off with a mere slap of the hand, (i.e. Senator Rockefeller’s special visit to the Middle East before the war with Iraq, Jane Fonda’s little jaunt in Vietnam, NY Times revealing every little top secret tidbit they can get their hands on, etc.). I would even say that the talking heads in the media harm our country more with their lies than Pollard ever could. I don’t know… I guess we have to punish him somehow for getting caught to keep face. But life in prison? Serial killers and rapists commit far worse crimes and sometimes don’t get life in prison. Weird.

“To Be Married Means to Be Outnumbered” from everybody’s favorite traitor, the New York Times.

This was pretty much a hodgepodge of statistics that didn’t bother me one way or the other. But, there were a few lines that made me chuckle.

The highest share of male couples was in San Francisco, where, according to the census, they accounted for nearly 2 percent of all households.

Hahaha… um, are we supposed to be surprised here? Do they honestly think they’re telling us something we don’t know?

A number of couples interviewed agreed that cohabiting was akin to taking a test drive and, given the scarcity of affordable apartments and homes, also a matter of convenience. Some said that pregnancy was the only thing that would prompt them to make a legal commitment soon. Others said they never intended to marry. A few of those couples said they were inspired by solidarity with gay and lesbian couples who cannot legally marry in most states.

… a test drive? Ew. Convenience? Double ew. Never intending to marry? Give me a break. I’m pretty sure that is just code for: “Hey, I kind of like you, but who knows what hottie may come by next so let’s keep this on the down-low.” And the solidarity thing really does make me laugh. I say, knock yourselves out kiddos.

There was only one little quote that crossed the funny line and honestly annoyed me just a bit.

“Cohabitating is our choice, and we have no intention to be married,” Ms. Lynch said. “There is little difference between what we do and what married people do. We love each other, exist together, all of our decisions are based upon each other. Everyone we care about knows this.”

If anything, she added, “not having the false security of wedding rings makes us work even a little harder.”

False security? Oh, I’m sorry. You must have meant the maturity to actually commit to a moral relationship rather than just shacking up. Cohabitating is your choice, eh? You mean you couldn’t convince your man to marry you. I almost feel sorry for you… but not quite.

“Ban Ki-Moon: Rice Should Talk with North Korea” from the completely unbiased ABC News

I actually read this on Hot Air and thought it was really interesting. As I stated in my comment there, I ultimately feel that the UN is a completely useless waste of time, money, and New York real estate. However, because our President and Congress are completely spineless and would never withdraw from the UN, we basically have to put up with it… for now. When I’m the president (I turn 35 in 2022, so I’ll be elected in… 2024, right?), we’ll get rid of it. Anyway, back to putting up with it for now. I am slightly optimistic about Ban Ki-Moon (is that all his last name or is Ban his first name?) in that he doesn’t hate America yet. “Slightly optimistic” really means nothing. He’s just off to a bit of a better start that Kofi Annan.

Sphere: Related Content