Comment posted by no2liberals
at 1/3/2007 11:27:45 PM

Don’t listen to her, Fire. No need to come back. There aren’t enough punctuation marks in the universe to help you elucidate your lack of knowledge or reason.

Comment posted by SwampWoman
at 1/3/2007 11:24:55 PM

Great example of tangential thinking, though.

Comment posted by SwampWoman
at 1/3/2007 11:19:22 PM

Sugar, would you like to go back and punctuate that correctly so that we can make some sense out of what you are trying to say?

Comment posted by Fire
at 1/3/2007 11:03:37 PM

Oh how ridiculous old man couldn’t barely get up the steps he’s is 69 years old one more week and he would have been to old by there laws to even hang and what did he do well he killed 1400 or so members of another group that was not in power that they were having an interior war with so we went in because of what? Well, he didn’t personally but his military did OK lets think on that I hope you get the thought. The nukes he had dam they weren’t found then we got him and what turned him over to his enemies to what to put them in power This is total bull. If he was to be tried he should have been tried here for what he supposedly had done that they never found so go figure. Same as our government they go in and kill people you hear nothing someone has to be in power as you can see there no better then before just the other side is at hand now. Has Bush been charge for all the citizens that were killed? wonder how many that was how about our men? A thought there? Where the hell is Ben Laden didn’t he order the hit on the trade buildings that was over 3000 Americans! Well that’s my opinion on it What ever

Comment posted by SwampWoman
at 1/3/2007 9:13:13 AM

Wrap your mind around this, then, N2L. I don’t even know where my cell phone is. Haven’t used it/seen it for months.

What a change/mellowing out from a former type A personality, huh? (I’m devolving from a high-tech redneck to a no-tech redneck.)

Comment posted by no2liberals
at 1/3/2007 9:02:36 AM

How do you exist without one?
/I can’t remember

Comment posted by nuke
at 1/3/2007 8:55:33 AM

Ariane5. Count your blessings!

Comment posted by Ariane5
at 1/3/2007 8:24:30 AM

nuke. I don’t even own a cell phone.

Comment posted by no2liberals
at 1/1/2007 4:14:34 PM

Didn’t you hear, wez?
A WMD was found hanging on the end of a rope in Iraq, just a few days ago.
There is even video!
Not everyone is as obsessed with President Bush’s anal functions, as you.
/twit

Comment posted by wez
at 1/1/2007 3:52:32 PM

iraq is a shit nation the new goverment look like a bunch of twats. probably end up even worse than before. if the americans leave it will become worse if they stay the same will happen no win situation. they found nueclear bombs in george bush’s ass.

Comment posted by claire
at 5/8/2007 12:18:08 PM

where are the most popular dogs names then?

Comment posted by Mick
at 3/23/2007 9:23:37 PM

Two. Those are good German names. I’ve seen a lady in Santa Barbara with two named Mustard and Relish.

Comment posted by SwampWoman
at 3/23/2007 8:54:21 PM

Heh. One of my grandfathers had a couple of weiner dogs, Hansel and Gretel (his grasp of German names was somewhat limited).

Comment posted by Mick
at 3/23/2007 8:42:58 PM

We have to wiener dogs named Lucy and Molly.

Comment posted by Mick
at 3/23/2007 8:41:19 PM

Thanks. Good name for a boy. But I have too smart and beautiful daughters.

Comment posted by Daphne Jansen
at 3/21/2007 1:16:43 PM

My old neighbours had a pitbull terrier called Tyson…nice little baby name for you!

Comment posted by DogInfos
at 1/15/2007 9:36:19 PM

good topic about dog name. If you want to chooise a good name for your dog, you can see more at http://doginfos.com, all thing about for your dogs: dog name, dog breed, dog health, dog picture…

Comment posted by Mick
at 12/31/2006 4:26:36 PM

Mr. Bigglesworth… sounds familiar, Austin Powers maybe.

Comment posted by SwampWoman
at 12/30/2006 6:36:32 PM

You welcome, Mick. You’re a gentleman and a scholar.

Comment posted by SwampWoman
at 12/30/2006 6:35:26 PM

Oh, the shame of those names.

Comment posted by vimto1
at 12/31/2006 4:24:24 AM

I love a good cup of coffee when I’m out - and I always avoid Starbucks. Dreadful stuff, went in once and that was enough to convince me for life - how on earth did it get market dominance?

Swamplady, it must be hard to be feeling ill and having to work on a farm in the busy season, but be as gentle with yourself as you can.

Comment posted by no2liberals
at 12/30/2006 4:41:09 PM

Yeah SwampMan!
/now if he will only watch the Chik-Fil-A Bowl tonight

Comment posted by SwampWoman
at 12/30/2006 4:38:35 PM

Heh. SwampMan came out with me to unload, and I put him to good use! The feedroom is getting cleaned, feed sacks burned, and it looks good out there.

Comment posted by SwampWoman
at 12/30/2006 4:01:53 PM

Well, SwampMan, in deference to my sickly condition, went and bought feed and brought it back for me today. His solicitude didn’t extend to unloading it, of course (I don’t know where it goes!) or feeding, so I shall go unload and stack the hay and feed and tend the poor neglected critters. Not that neglected, I suppose; the only ones that didn’t get their morning feed were the horses and they can glean some of the hay they’ve wasted.

Comment posted by SwampWoman
at 12/30/2006 3:56:48 PM

Who, me cynical? Perish the thought.

Comment posted by SwampWoman
at 12/30/2006 3:55:53 PM

They’re (Starbucks) going in all over around here. I suspect that many, many people will be paying a great deal just to be seen getting their coffeeish drinks there as a indicator of their good taste.

/And individuality.

Comment posted by no2liberals
at 12/30/2006 3:45:39 PM

Talk about real life!
A young lady gave me a Starbuck’s frappacino(sp?), and I just threw half of it away. It tastes like…medicine!
I guess that is a tangible difference, in the tastes of a true conservative, and an uber-liberal, like Michael Moron, as he suggested we should all sit down together and have one of those disgusting drinks.
/blecch!

Comment posted by no2liberals
at 12/30/2006 1:26:48 PM

A TOOTH FOR A MILLION TEETH!

Therefore, it is of political urgency to eliminate this symbol and put an end to any hopes and illusions of a return to the previous state of affairs. Due to the extreme personality cult that Saddam had cultivated, it would be difficult for “the enemy” to find a new convincing father figure. Also it is an act of defiance in the face of all the terrorists, the Bin Ladins & Co., the international chorus and etc. etc.; here we are stringing up your Saddam and you “can ride your highest horses” as the Iraqi proverb goes. We are not afraid of your car bombs, suicide bombers, I.E.D’s etc. etc.

Comment posted by no2liberals
at 12/30/2006 1:20:15 PM

(2006-12-30) — The Pentagon announced this morning that a weapon of mass destruction (WMD) was found today in Baghdad, hanging from a rope on a platform.

ScrappleFace

Comment posted by no2liberals
at 12/30/2006 1:15:21 PM

Oh, hey…vimto, I was just messin’ when I said that. Life goes on, pip-pip, cheerio, and all that.
Who’d a thunk a dhimmicrat like Boxer, would even bother to look into CAIR, especially after handing out an award.
Yeah, another toon for CAIR. Such a target rich organization for lampooning.

Hey, check this out, haven’t heard anything about this on the LameStream media.
Mass Arrests of Military Officers in Syria.
Interesting, if true…n’est pas?

Comment posted by no2liberals
at 1/1/2007 8:58:57 AM

I think it would have to be an ‘06 story.
How does it go?

Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery.
What are you doing about today?

Comment posted by cuzoogle
at 1/1/2007 6:14:27 AM

Certainly one of the stories of the year. Now will it fall under 2006 or 2007 ??

Comment posted by Unedited Video of Saddam Execution « Nuke’s news & views
at 12/30/2006 9:36:32 PM

[…] see also: He’s dead, Jim […]

Comment posted by nuke
at 12/30/2006 6:23:56 PM

Heh, ‘preshate that

Comment posted by David Drake
at 12/30/2006 6:14:05 PM

Great Headline, just LOL / ROTFL Funny: “He’s Dead, Jim”

KUDOS!

Comment posted by no2liberals
at 12/30/2006 12:37:30 PM

awad al-Zubaidi, a victim who testified at Saddam’s trial and who was allowed to view the corpse during a private reception at Maliki’s office, said: “When I saw the body in the coffin, I cried. I remembered my three brothers and my father who he had killed. I approached the body and told him: ‘This is the well-deserved punishment of every tyrant.”

Comment posted by no2liberals
at 12/30/2006 12:17:41 PM

I’m waiting, but not breathlessly, for Ramsey Clark’s statement, concerning his client’s justifiable demise.
Here are a few of Clark’s(piss be upon him) in recent days:
21 Dec 06

Clark said that while executing Saddam would incite more violence in Baghdad and elsewhere in Iraq and the Middle East, removing U.S. forces would bring calm to the region.

“You will have less violence if you remove the U.S. troops immediately,” he said, promising to work toward bringing troops home immediately.

27 Dec 06

Deposed Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein’s life is in President Bush’s hands and should be spared, said former U.S. Attorney General Ramsey Clark on Wednesday.

Clark, a member of Saddam’s defense team, said the decision Bush makes following an Iraqi court’s rejection of Saddam’s appeal “will have long-term consequences for the peace and stability of Iraq, and for the rule of law as a means to peace.”

29 Dec 06

Kristinn Taylor, president of the local Free Republic chapter, was walking through the concourse of Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport on Wednesday afternoon when he spotted one of Saddam Hussein’s attorneys, Ramsey Clark, who was attorney general under President Lyndon B. Johnson.
“As we walked by each other in the uncrowded terminal, I made a slashing motion across my neck and said to him, ‘It’s too bad about Saddam,’ ” in reference to the deposed Iraqi tyrant’s failed judicial appeal to avert his death sentence.
At that point, he said, Mr. Clark “glanced back at me with a hangdog look and nodded his head in sad agreement.”

I will continue to follow any and all comments by Clark. He may be considered by some as a “long-time peace activist” or an “American contrarian,” but to me those adjectives are inadequate. I consider him to be Anti-American, a manipulator of legalisms for his own agenda, suffers from senility, and a supreme hypocrit. If America is such an evil force in the world, above all others, then he should renounce his citizenship, move to say…Zimbabwe, and forfeit all of his U.S. retirement pay and benefits, from his service as U.S. Attorney General.

Comment posted by no2liberals
at 12/30/2006 11:39:28 AM

Conjugal visits, cable television, supervised physical exercise, and maybe even Internet access would have made Saddam’s days tolerable, if not enjoyable.

But, alas, Saddam was captured in Iraq, not America. So instead of conjugal visits, large contingents of lawyers, and prison amenities worthy of a king, Saddam got—Ramsey Clark.

Perhaps the Lord does have a sense of humor, after all. That would explain the irony of Saddam Hussein having his very life boiling down to the competency of Ramsey Clark. That is a good one, Lord!

Executing the Law in Iraq.

Comment posted by vimto1
at 12/30/2006 4:42:37 AM

N2L wrote “I would have recommended and upheld the death penalty, I take no pleasure in the death of a man and regret that it was necessary.”

I totally agree. Yet, and here is the paradox -it is that which makes an execution powerful - it should shock us folks - it should send out a message that this crime was evil and cannot and will not be tollerated,- see how we have to deal with it!?

Judicious use of the death penalty values life - over use devalues it. That is why I believe abolition of the death penalty devalues it’s citizens and contributes to moral relativism.

Comment posted by Sarah D.
at 12/30/2006 12:37:40 AM

Nuke - goodness what a moron. I just saw it - I’ve been busy with other things lately.

Guess that article of mine really lit that moonbat up.

Comment posted by SwampWoman
at 12/29/2006 4:44:15 PM

Kuwait’s Not to Forget Museum. An excerpt:

My guide stressed that poor front-line conscripts served as cannon fodder at the tip of the spear, while Republican Guard troops remained in reserve, primed to “bug out when necessary.” He believes that a significant motivation for the conflict was Saddam’s desire to maintain a grip on domestic power in the face of restless ethnic majorities; that Hussein started wars to minimize Iran’s influence on Iraq’s Shiites, to keep potential rebels occupied and diminished in a state of constant war, and enable them to pillage resources from other countries as he could and would not provide for them himself.

All-in-all, not a terrible theory.

Yep.

Comment posted by nuke
at 12/29/2006 4:32:41 PM

Is that a trick question?

Comment posted by SwampWoman
at 12/29/2006 4:24:14 PM

Are there any predominantly Islamic countries in existence that do not have their citizens out happily performing acts of war/terrorism?