There is no War on Terror
April 28th, 2007 at 2:22 pm . by el nuko
I missed the democrat press conference debate Thursday night. And, to read the reviews, it was pretty much a non-event.
So, it came as a surprise to me to learn that there was some significant news that didn’t make the MSM after all. I would have missed it completely had it not been posted over at Free Republic. From Ben Smith’s blog at Politico.com…….
John Edwards doesn’t believe there’s a “global war on terror,” at least not in the simple-show-of-hands sense.
This is something a lot of Democrats say privately — and something mainstream pols everywhere else in the world say publicly — but it contests a Bush administration premise in a way very few American politicians have been comfortable in the last five and a half years.
His stance — though it doesn’t seem to have been all that deliberate — matches the recent comments of a prominent British politician. It’s the most direct challenge to the Bush administration’s whole worldview that I can recall from a leading Democrat.
Edwards aide David Ginsberg confirmed that the former North Carolina senator had not raised his hand in response to Brian Williams’ question,”Do you believe there is such a thing as a global war on terror?”
Now I know why Breck Girl™ needs 400 dollar hair cuts. It’s to get all the poopy out of his hair from having it shoved all the way up his azz.
Comment posted by david drake
at 4/30/2007 4:35:12 PM
great image!
Comment posted by Unfit for command « Nuke’s NEWS & VIEWS
at 4/29/2007 11:31:50 AM
[…] — nuke @ 11:31 am I’ve been going back, over and over again to John Edwards’ capricious assertion that there is no war on […]
Comment posted by no2liberals
at 4/28/2007 10:03:08 PM
Henh…John Edwards.
I see this primping, preening narcissist, and I just want to whip his arse.
Comment posted by bonz
at 4/28/2007 9:17:33 PM
Ripping off British pols can be dangerous. Ask Joe Biden about Neil Kinnock. Ruined ‘88 for old Joe
Sphere: Related Content

