<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nuke's News and Views</title>
	<link>http://conservablogs.com/nuke</link>
	<description>The truth will make you free...but at first, it might just piss you off</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 16:50:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Good for your heart</title>
		<link>http://conservablogs.com/nuke/2008/05/16/good-for-your-heart/</link>
		<comments>http://conservablogs.com/nuke/2008/05/16/good-for-your-heart/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 16:50:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>el nuko</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[news and politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conservablogs.com/nuke/2008/05/16/good-for-your-heart/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[from the Daily Mail &#8230;
A bullied office worker has been awarded £5,000 after her boss raised his right buttock from his chair and broke wind in her direction.
Humiliated mother-of-three Theresa Bailey, 43, was the only woman on a sales team where &#8220;laddish&#8221; behaviour made her life a misery, and continued despite complains to senior managers.
Flatulence [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>from the <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=566617&amp;in_page_id=1770&amp;Thbbbbt">Daily Mail</a> &#8230;</p>
<blockquote><p>A bullied office worker has been awarded £5,000 after her boss raised his right buttock from his chair and broke wind in her direction.</p>
<p><strong>Humiliated</strong> mother-of-three Theresa Bailey, 43, was the only woman on a sales team where &#8220;laddish&#8221; behaviour made her life a misery, and continued despite complains to senior managers.</p></blockquote>
<p>Flatulence is now considered bullying?  Dang&#8230; 8th grade boys around the world are now bullies. Who&#8217;d a thunk it?</p>
<p>I wonder if this also applies to the hand-under-the armpit fake flatulence?</p>
<p>Not to mention the effect all this flatulence has on global warming.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://conservablogs.com/nuke/2008/05/16/good-for-your-heart/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mississippi on my mind</title>
		<link>http://conservablogs.com/nuke/2008/05/14/mississippi-on-my-mind/</link>
		<comments>http://conservablogs.com/nuke/2008/05/14/mississippi-on-my-mind/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 04:53:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>el nuko</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Huckabee]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[McCain]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Mississippi]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[election 2008]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conservablogs.com/nuke/2008/05/14/mississippi-on-my-mind/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just got this email from Mike Huckabee&#8230;
Last night was a reminder of what a tough year this will be for Republicans. The loss of the Congressional seat in Mississippi was tough. We had a great candidate, but the Democrat very effectively ran as a pro life, pro 2nd amendment conservative. I&#8217;m convinced that for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just got this email from Mike Huckabee&#8230;</p>
<blockquote><p>Last night was a reminder of what a tough year this will be for Republicans. The loss of the Congressional seat in Mississippi was tough. We had a great candidate, but the Democrat very effectively ran as a pro life, pro 2nd amendment conservative. I&#8217;m convinced that for the GOP to have wins this year we have to focus on specific issues and not party building (for us) or party bashing (against them).</p>
<p>What do you think the GOP needs to do to reverse the slide in support and start winning elections?  <strong><a href="http://www.huckpac.com/?FuseAction=Blogs.View&amp;Blog_id=1645">LINK</a></strong>  </p></blockquote>
<p>You know, Mike.  A few months ago, you spent a great deal of time talking about Vertical Politics:  policies and issues which were neither right nor left, but were about lifting everyone up.  Is was an effective message.  We conservatives truly believe that conservative principles are the very essence of Vertical Politics.  The abandonment of conservative principles by the Republican Party is the main reason for the election losses.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s more. </p>
<p>High gas prices, the war, and the overall general funk that I tie up in a neat little ball called &#8220;Bush Fatigue.&#8221;  The general public blames the Republicans for all of the ills in the world, and the President won&#8217;t defend himself or the Party.  And even when he tries, he is so inarticulate that we cringe every time he steps up to the microphone.  </p>
<p>Mike, we&#8217;ve been waiting to go on offense since the budget battle of &#8216;96.  But, one by one, we&#8217;ve watched our leadership get picked off by a sex or money scandal, and all our time has been spent on defense.  And then we get junk coming out of the Congress like Foley, Abramoff, Delay, Ney, and  Cunningham&#8230; and uncontrolled spending, and bigger and more obtrusive government programs &#8230; illegal immigration out the wazoo, and the President, as well as our presumptive nominee, on record as supporting a path to citizenship for those who have entered here illegally (just doing jobs Americans won&#8217;t do, my foot), even going so far as to tie the hands of the border enforcement agents charged with a near impossible and thankless task.  The fact that Compean and Ramos are still in a jail cell irks us to no end.</p>
<p>The fact is, we&#8217;re mad, Mike.  But not so much at the Democrats.  They aren&#8217;t doing anything that we don&#8217;t expect out of them.  They&#8217;ve behaved disgustingly, and continue to do so.  No, we&#8217;re mad at the Republicans for not carrying the fight to the Democrats.  We vote for men and women who promise to fight the good fight when they are back home campaigning, but when they get to DC, they seem to be interested only in being liked by the opposition, lining their pockets, or getting their groove on.  Our elected representatives have refused to stand up and fight for our principles, and we don&#8217;t see any real advantage to returning them to DC.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m going to tell you something else, Mike.  If John McCain doesn&#8217;t get off this global warming kick, he&#8217;s going to need a heck of a lot of crossover voters in order to win &#8212; because there are a whole bunch of us who will not vote for him if he stabs us in the back.  Again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://conservablogs.com/nuke/2008/05/14/mississippi-on-my-mind/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Same as the old boss</title>
		<link>http://conservablogs.com/nuke/2008/05/13/same-as-the-old-boss/</link>
		<comments>http://conservablogs.com/nuke/2008/05/13/same-as-the-old-boss/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 15:31:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>el nuko</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[news and politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conservablogs.com/nuke/2008/05/13/same-as-the-old-boss/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It seems so long ago, that Nancy Pelosi promised the most ethical Congress ever.  
After a year and a half of ethical leadership, how is the Dem congress shaping up?  More of the same&#8230;
a $170 million earmark for the salmon industry, quietly tucked into the mammoth bill at the last minute by Speaker [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems so long ago, that Nancy Pelosi promised the most ethical Congress ever.  </p>
<p>After a year and a half of ethical leadership, how is the Dem congress shaping up?  More of the same&#8230;</p>
<blockquote><p>a $170 million earmark for the salmon industry, quietly tucked into the mammoth bill at the last minute by Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) and Rep. Mike Thompson (D-CA). I don’t know much about the salmon industry. Perhaps Pelosi and Thompson can explain why it was necessary to earmark $170 million of the taxpayers’ money with no public scrutiny or debate. The earmark wasn’t in the House-passed Farm Bill or the Senate version; it was simply “air-dropped” into the final bill in secret.  <a href="http://www.townhall.com/columnists/JohnBoehner/2008/05/12/farm_bill_yet_another_example_of_democrats_broken_promises_on_earmark_reform">source</a></p></blockquote>
<p>Drain that swamp, baybee.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://conservablogs.com/nuke/2008/05/13/same-as-the-old-boss/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama refuses to release his birth certificate</title>
		<link>http://conservablogs.com/nuke/2008/05/12/obama-refuses-to-release-his-birth-certificate/</link>
		<comments>http://conservablogs.com/nuke/2008/05/12/obama-refuses-to-release-his-birth-certificate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 04:14:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>el nuko</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[moonbats]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conservablogs.com/nuke/2008/05/12/obama-refuses-to-release-his-birth-certificate/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In an attempt to put to rest the persistent rumor that Barry Soetoro, aka Barak Hussein Obama&#8217;s real name isn&#8217;t Barak Hussein Muhhamed Obama, the St. Pete Times published this interesting paragraph&#8230;
We tried to obtain a copy of Obama’s birth certificate, but his campaign would not release it and the state of Hawaii does not [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In an attempt to put to rest the persistent rumor that <a href="http://jkn.com/View?j=905278.602631536527&amp;u=978982021724">Barry Soetoro</a>, aka Barak Hussein Obama&#8217;s real name isn&#8217;t Barak Hussein Muhhamed Obama, the <a href="http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/464/">St. Pete Times</a> published this interesting paragraph&#8230;</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>We tried to obtain a copy of Obama’s birth certificate, but his campaign would not release it and the state of Hawaii does not make such records public. </strong></p></blockquote>
<p>St. Pete Times&#8217; effort to put to rest the rumors about Obama have raised more questions than they have answered&#8230;.</p>
<p><strong>Why won&#8217;t Obama release his birth certificate?</p>
<p>What is he trying to hide?</strong></p>
<p>File this under &#8220;John Kerry&#8217;s 180&#8243;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://conservablogs.com/nuke/2008/05/12/obama-refuses-to-release-his-birth-certificate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can we ask?  Yes, we can!</title>
		<link>http://conservablogs.com/nuke/2008/05/10/can-we-ask-yes-we-can/</link>
		<comments>http://conservablogs.com/nuke/2008/05/10/can-we-ask-yes-we-can/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 01:48:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>el nuko</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Gravitas]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[news and politics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conservablogs.com/nuke/2008/05/10/can-we-ask-yes-we-can/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[


]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/9HTPgrXISqw&#038;hl=en"></param>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/9HTPgrXISqw&#038;hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://conservablogs.com/nuke/2008/05/10/can-we-ask-yes-we-can/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
