<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thompson Opines on Civil Unions/Domestic Partnerships</title>
	<link>http://conservablogs.com/ohio4fred/2007/11/03/thompson-opines-on-civil-unionsdomestic-partnerships/</link>
	<description>Fred Thompson for President in 2008!!</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 22:47:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://conservablogs.com/ohio4fred/2007/11/03/thompson-opines-on-civil-unionsdomestic-partnerships/#comment-94</link>
		<author>Tim</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 16:03:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://conservablogs.com/ohio4fred/2007/11/03/thompson-opines-on-civil-unionsdomestic-partnerships/#comment-94</guid>
					<description>Renee,

Thanks for posting that explanation by Senator Thompson.  This is an issue in which Fred's position has been widely misrepresented and it needs to be clarified.  I hope he also has a chance to address this on "Meet the Press" this Sunday.

One other point needs to be explained regarding Fred Thompson's stance on this issue.  Fred has made it clear that individual states must not be bound to accept the position of other states.  In other words, if California chooses to permit same sex marriages, Ohio could not be forced to recognize them.  

One of Fred Thompson's guiding principles is that of Federalism and limited central government.  I respect his determination to stick with his core principles, even if it conflicts with his personal opinion.  Too often politicians and others are quick to abandon principles and core values for the quick or easy fix.  It is this lack of strong principles and core values that leads many politicians and other leaders to "flip-flop" on issues with little consideration of consistency, integrity, or core beliefs.

We do not need another leader that finds his values and principles in the latest opinion polls or what feels good at the moment.  One Clinton was enough.
 ..... one was too much.
         
Fred Thompson in 2008!!   (just over one year before decision day)

Tim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Renee,</p>
<p>Thanks for posting that explanation by Senator Thompson.  This is an issue in which Fred&#8217;s position has been widely misrepresented and it needs to be clarified.  I hope he also has a chance to address this on &#8220;Meet the Press&#8221; this Sunday.</p>
<p>One other point needs to be explained regarding Fred Thompson&#8217;s stance on this issue.  Fred has made it clear that individual states must not be bound to accept the position of other states.  In other words, if California chooses to permit same sex marriages, Ohio could not be forced to recognize them.  </p>
<p>One of Fred Thompson&#8217;s guiding principles is that of Federalism and limited central government.  I respect his determination to stick with his core principles, even if it conflicts with his personal opinion.  Too often politicians and others are quick to abandon principles and core values for the quick or easy fix.  It is this lack of strong principles and core values that leads many politicians and other leaders to &#8220;flip-flop&#8221; on issues with little consideration of consistency, integrity, or core beliefs.</p>
<p>We do not need another leader that finds his values and principles in the latest opinion polls or what feels good at the moment.  One Clinton was enough.<br />
 &#8230;.. one was too much.</p>
<p>Fred Thompson in 2008!!   (just over one year before decision day)</p>
<p>Tim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
