The Gentle Critic (The Muslim’s Most Feared Enemy)

January 4, 2008 | Filed Under Dawn Stricson, Foreign Policy, Islam, Islamofascism, Military, News, Publius Contributor, Religion, Society/Culture, War on Terror |

-by Dawn Stricson

The gentle critic is certainly a harmless critic and whether I like it or not, the “gentle critic (the Muslim’s most feared enemy)” is certainly one of the most honest titles I can give to a conclusion that my more than 25 years of critical research have compelled me to come to.

Knowing what I do, it would be very dishonest of me to deny the fact that a certain religious-political ideology (better known as Islam) belongs in a category representing the world’s most dangerous cults, not any category representing anything as benign as the Christianity that is represented in the canonical New Testament documents. The ideology to which I am referring is primarily that which belongs to Muhammad’s disciples alone (i.e., a group of people who are hopelessly devoted to the blatantly tortured logic, devious spirit, and outrageously unjust mentality of a socially immature, cruel, warmongering and murderous thief, sex offender, pedophile, child-abuser, delusional idiot, deranged lunatic, terrorist, racist, imposter, and chauvinist; a group of people who are helplessly devoted to a 7th-century Arab who had serious prejudices against blacks, non-Arabs, and non-Muslims; a group of people who consider such a man to be the best example of a human being that one can follow; or Mohammedans, a group of people who prefer to be called Muslim’s).

Muhammad (alternately spelled M-o-h-a-m-m-e-d) was the founder of Islam. To this day, his disciples remain irrationally devoted to everything he said about his god, his revelations, and his authority. They certainly aren’t as devoted to his god as they are to his words about his god. Furthermore, they remain irrationally devoted to his arrogantly offensive, sex-offending, immature, or anti-social character, along with his obviously delusional and deranged way of thinking. The writings that settle all disputes among his disciples compel even the simplest of normal minds to say as much without hesitation. Indeed, the only minds that are incapable of saying so without hesitation are those that have been brainwashed or terrorized by the spirit of Mohammed’s tortured logic. On this basis, it would be much more correct to call Mohammed’s disciples Mohammedans than it would to call them Muslims.

With this in mind, no one should be surprised if Mohammedans, including the most supposedly moderate ones among them, find it practically impossible to avoid acting like very immature people, even emotionally disturbed children, over harmless books (like “Satanic Verses”) and over innocent cartoon drawings that reflect the character of Muhammad’s Satanic authority, child-abusing sexual appetites, social immaturity, mental instability, or desperately cruel disposition towards all harmless individuals that refuse to live according to his outrageously tortured logic. No normal responsible adult would allow such a character to live outside the confines of a mental institution.

The obviously and insanely unjust laws that rule all Islamic societies; the obviously immature and lame logic that Mohammedans use to defend the outrageously tortured logic behind the Islamic creed and the authority that settles all disputes among them make it practically impossible for anyone in his or her right mind to avoid thinking that the gentle critic is the Mohammedan’s most feared enemy.

Because of its obviously sick nature, the cult that Mohammed created out of the depths of his tortured mind cannot possibly be defended using logically coherent arguments. That is why a double standard is always employed whenever Mohammedans attempt to defend their faith in Mohammed’s outrageously obvious irrationalities. It doesn’t take Mohammedans very long to discover that they cannot explain the outrageously sick nature of their prophet’s character without employing some kind of double standard (i.e., one standard that makes very limited use of logically coherent arguments and another that relies most heavily upon the rationality of either an emotionally disturbed child, a lying propagandist, an unskillful con-artist, a stupid diplomat, or a fierce warmongering terrorist).
——
Dawn Stricson may be reached for comments at voice_oftruth@yahoo.com.

Bookmark this story to your favorite service: