Let’s just use the real word here. Drilling. There, now that wasn’t so hard to say now, was it? I was shocked to find a one-sided story in the Red Star Tribune again.

By BOB MOEN
Associated Press writer

DANIEL — In a state graced with mountain ranges such as the Tetons and Wind Rivers, the Wyoming Range isn’t well known, even in its namesake state.

But to people living within its late afternoon shadows, the Wyoming Range is no less awe-inspiring.

“The experience of the Wyomings transcends all talk about them,” resident Pete Doenges said. “They are a treasure and a sacred place, and getting people out to feel the healing power of this place can leave deep impressions.”

“This is heaven,” resident Mary Borgeson said. “We got everything up here.”

But “heaven” is under attack in their view by a federal government that has offered tens of thousands of acres of public land, including national forest land, in the Wyoming Range for possible oil and gas exploration and drilling.

With oil and gas activity already at a fever pitch in the expansive flatlands of Wyoming, the idea of leasing forested areas within the scenic range has created a groundswell of opposition and alliances between environmentalists and outfitters — groups normally at opposite ends of the political spectrum.

“They can’t keep up with what they’re doing now,” said Gary Amerine, an outfitter who charges a fee to guide people to hunt, fish or just enjoy the scenery in the Wyoming Range. “We aren’t against what’s going on in the other areas, so why don’t they keep going there and leave the forest alone?”

Oh, I get it. Not in my back yard? It’s interesting to google some of the names in the article. Turns out, they’re just typical environmentalists.

Federal land managers say oil and gas development is just one of the many activities allowed in the range, and energy industry representatives maintain that some parts of the Wyoming Range can be drilled without permanently damaging the environment or shutting down other recreational activities.

What’s that you say? I can’t hear you because as an environmentalist, I never listen to the facts or the truth. I only listen to what my little green group tells me. Other than that, I’m a closed minded idiot.

“There are certainly areas that need to be protected, I’ll agree wholeheartedly with that,” said Bruce Hinchey, president of the Petroleum Association of Wyoming. “But there are some outlying areas that possibly can be looked at.”

Home in the wild

The Wyoming Range is about 400,000 acres — 70 miles long and 25 to 30 miles wide, running north to south in far western Wyoming, with its north end about 20 miles south of Jackson. It’s teeming with elk, moose, deer, antelope, grizzly bears, black bears, mountain lions and lynx. Wyoming Peak is the highest among its mountains at 11,363 feet. The east side of the range is mostly sloping mountainsides, while much of the west side falls off steeply into the Greys River, which separates the range from the parallel Salt River Range.

Funny thing is, these people are pro wolf and pro grizzly — which doesn’t speak well for the other game in the state. When outfitters start to team up with greenies, they slit their own throats. Strange alliance — or can I just say, stupid alliance.

Leland and Mary Borgeson’s home has an expansive view of the Wyoming Range outside their back windows and a view of the Wind River Range to the east outside the front. “Town” is 12 miles away at Pinedale, which has a population of about 1,700.

It’s not unusual for deer, elk, moose and antelope to wander around the home, where they’ve lived the last six years in retirement. One time a moose peered through a house window at them; another time a deer followed Mrs. Borgeson into her garage.

Ummm …. I live in town and it’s not that unusual to find deer in my back yard every morning. Mrs. Borgeson is not that special, the deer, elk, moose, and antelope are not partial to her place only.

The Wyoming Range sustains them with meat from wildlife they hunt and firewood to heat their house. The mountains and forest also provide them with camping, fishing and four-wheeled recreation.

Four-wheeled recreation? That doesn’t sound environmentally friendly for anyone but the Borgesons.

Doenges, a computer and electrical engineer, spent four years building a log home in a heavily wooded, hilly area near the base of the Wyoming Range. It’s about a 25-minute drive to his mailbox.

He and his wife hike extensively in the Wyoming Range and cut dead timber for firewood to heat their cabin.

“It’s just magic. It’s a tough kind of magic,” he said.

Challenging leases

The Wyoming Range is entirely within the 3.4 million-acre Bridger-Teton National Forest managed by the U.S. Forest Service, which is in the process of revising its management plan for the forest. The current plan, enacted in the 1990s, allows for oil and gas leasing as one of the many uses in the Wyoming Range.

Over the last year, the Forest Service has put up for sale 44,600 acres in the Wyoming Range, according to Greg Clark, district forest ranger. An additional 150,000 acres has been leased since the 1970s, but most has not been developed.

Oil and gas operators had most recently sought leases on some 175,000 acres in the Bridger-Teton National Forest, but the agency pared that down to 44,600 after receiving protests from Democratic Gov. Dave Freudenthal, Sen. Craig Thomas, R-Wyo., and others, Clark said.

But the 44,600 acres is still contentious. Because of protests from local residents, conservationists and others, a federal land management board has halted any development on some 21,000 of the 44,600 acres and is considering appeals on other areas.

Clark said the 44,600 acres offered for sale by the Forest Service through auctions run by the Bureau of Land Management are in areas where roads or logging already exist.

“We didn’t lease at all in any roadless areas,” he said.

Are you kidding me? In areas where roads or logging already exist? Well, that’s no fun if we’re not going to be ripping out the forest by its roots and building roads several lanes wide with nasty black asphalt.

This is a really really really long article with two sentences dedicated to the side of Oil and Gas. At least the Red Star Tribune doesn’t claim to be fair and balanced.

Banding together

But conservationists, state officials and area residents contend the Wyoming Range should be off limits. They note that the valley between the Wyoming Range and the Wind River Range is being heavily drilled already.

“I know the nation needs electricity,” Borgeson said. “But I think Wyoming is doing far more than its share to support that.”

Doenges said the heavy truck traffic, pollution and noise associated with drilling would shatter the peace and disrupt the abundant wildlife in the Wyoming Range.

“This is not a crusade against gas and oil or political parties, but there are places in the West that should be hands off,” Doenges said.

Doenges, Amerine and others have formed a group called Citizens Protecting the Wyoming Range. It has attracted ranchers, hunters, outfitters and others usually not associated with the more traditional environmental groups.

“They all have a shared respect for the mountain and don’t want to see it developed,” Doenges said.

Amerine said his outfitting business would suffer because hunters and sightseers he guides don’t want to see gas wells in the middle of a pristine forest. He acknowledged the fight against the Wyoming Range leases has created an unusual alliance with more traditional conservation groups.

“Some of them don’t want even me up there,” Amerine said. “They want to put a fence around the forest.”

But any previous differences have been put aside for now because both sides realize that a combined effort is more effective in stopping the development, he said.

No intent to harm

Exxon Mobil Corp. has a few existing wells and is drilling another well on the southern fringe of the forest in the Wyoming Range, but no major development has occurred or is happening.

Hinchey, of the Petroleum Association of Wyoming, said the dozen wells Exxon Mobil drilled in the 1980s have not caused any problems.

“They’ve done a great job of protecting the environment and taking care of the wildlife,” Hinchey said.

The leases in the Wyoming Range are being sought based merely on the speculation that there might be oil and gas deposits there, he said.

And any company finding oil or gas faces daunting obstacles: rugged terrain, the lack of access by ground, the harsh weather conditions and high reclamation costs, he said.

In addition, it isn’t in the best interest of oil and gas companies to destroy pristine forest, he said.

“We’ve been in the state 120 years, we’ve got abundant wildlife, and we want to keep it that way,” Hinchey said.

Really? You may as well be talking to a brick wall — greenies have one goal: looking out for themselves and getting government grants in order to live a life of luxury protect wildlife and terrain.

Not that we’re much better here in the states. This just demonstrates the dangers of being a child in the world today. Apparently, the world’s children need to be on the endangered species list. I saw this over at Sweetness & Light — my favorite blog.

It’s Sunday, and I don’t want to post the entire article. Especially since you can link over to Sweetness & Light and read it there. I did find the following part interesting:

The practice of killing the girl child is more prevalent among the educated, including in upmarket districts of New Delhi, making it more challenging for the government, the minister said.

“How do we tell educated people that you must not do it? And these are people who would visit all the female deities and pray for strength but don’t hesitate to kill a girl child,” she said.

It leaves me thinking that the world’s problems cannot be solved by educating people.

This kind of news should serve as a reminder that Jesus is the reason for the season — without Him, there is no hope.

UPDATE: When Dr. Dobson says it, it just sounds so much nicer.

In raising these issues, Focus on the Family does not desire to harm or insult women such as Cheney and Poe. Rather, our conviction is that birth and adoption are the purview of married heterosexual couples. Traditional marriage is God’s design for the family and is rooted in biblical truth. When that divine plan is implemented, children have the best opportunity to thrive. That’s why public policy as it relates to families must be based not solely on the desires of adults but rather on the needs of children and what is best for society at large.

Hmmm …. That’s just icing on the cake. I love the VP, but this is just a repulsive reminder of the jeopardy America’s families are in. Not trying to be mean, but I would be ashamed of my child turning out like this. The Cheneys — bless their ignorant hearts, were busy doing other things when they should have been tending to their kids. Judgemental? My blog, I’ll say what I freaking want.

By The Associated Press

WASHINGTON (AP) — Mary Cheney, the openly gay daughter of Vice President Dick Cheney and his wife, Lynne, is pregnant.

Mary Cheney, 37, and her partner of 15 years, Heather Poe, 45, are expecting a baby, said Lea Anne McBride, a spokeswoman for the vice president. The baby is due in late spring.

“The vice president and Mrs. Cheney are looking forward with eager anticipation to the arrival of their sixth grandchild,” McBride said.

The vice president’s other, older daughter, Elizabeth Cheney, is on leave as deputy assistant secretary of state after having her fifth child with her husband in July.

Mary Cheney was an aide to her father during the 2004 campaign, as was Elizabeth, and now is vice president for consumer advocacy at AOL.

McBride declined to elaborate on the circumstances of Mary Cheney’s pregnancy. Mary Cheney and Poe moved from Colorado to Virginia a year ago to be closer to the Cheney family.

The Washington Post first reported the news in Wednesday’s editions.

McBride declined to elaborate on the circumstances of Mary Cheney’s pregnancy? Does that mean that Heather Poe isn’t the father? Inquiring minds don’t give a flying rip.

You would think the left would love Cheney on this social issue / circumstance, but they still hate him because they are hypocrites.