Go to the victimsoflaw website (http://victimsoflaw.net/JudgeSamuelKent.htm) and read about 20 articles on the Judge…notice his political Party is never mentioned? (this ALWAYS tells you he is a democrat)…the media died last year.
Here are just 2 of the listed articles…now tell us again that all these articles would fail to mention he was a Republican? Go ahead, tell us…you liar.
=====
Congressional committee puts judge inquiry on hold

U.S. House members say they’ll await criminal investion into accusations that federal District Judge Samuel Kent groped former employee.
By Juan A. Lozano, Associated Press

11-14-07 — A congressional committee said Tuesday that it will hold off looking into accusations against a federal judge suspended amid claims that he harassed a female employee. . . . The woman’s attorney said he welcomed the committee’s decision and believed it was the right thing to do. . . . In a statement, the U.S. House Judiciary Committee said it will not take any action related to U.S. District Judge Samuel Kent until other steps, such as a criminal investigation, take place. . . . The committee has jurisdiction over the administration of federal courts. . . . “The recently publicized charges against Kent are shocking and cause grave concern for all of us,” the committee said in a statement attributed to Chairman John Conyers Jr., D-Mich.; courts subcommittee Chairman Howard Berman, D-Calif.; and ranking GOP member Lamar Smith, R-San Antonio. . . . “While the alleged conduct is disgraceful, it is, nonetheless, the practice of the House Committee on the Judiciary to defer formal action until available intermediate remedies have been pursued.”

Congress must step in on Kent

By Heber Taylor, The Daily News

11-14-07 — The federal judicial system has failed to do its duty in handling accusations against U.S. District Judge Samuel B. Kent. Now, what the courts have failed to do, Congress must do. . . . Based on everything now known about the judge’s conduct, the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals should have seen to it that Kent resigned or faced an impeachment inquiry or perhaps even criminal prosecution. . . . The court took no such action, and thus it reinforces a disturbing notion: Federal judges are themselves above the law. . . . Cathy McBroom, Kent’s former case manager, complained that the judge grabbed her, pulled up her blouse and bra and put his mouth on her breast. She said the alleged assault occurred in the judge’s chambers in Galveston’s federal court. . . . The judges who looked into this complaint could have done several things. They could, for example, have seen to it that assault charges were filed with the proper authorities.

Posted on January 7th, 2009 by Doug Schexnayder, Ph.D.
Filed under: HYPOCRITICAL