<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: They&#8217;re Endorsing Who???</title>
	<atom:link href="http://conservablogs.com/wyovotes/2007/11/07/theyre-endorsing-who/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://conservablogs.com/wyovotes/2007/11/07/theyre-endorsing-who/</link>
	<description>It's America All Over Again</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 21:58:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://conservablogs.com/wyovotes/2007/11/07/theyre-endorsing-who/#comment-5962</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2007 19:30:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conservablogs.com/wyovotes/2007/11/07/theyre-endorsing-who/#comment-5962</guid>
		<description>So, Rudy is pro-abortion and pro-homosexual, not to mention has a distinctly less than-Christian-conservative family history with all the divorces and whatnot, not to mention some of his top campaign people being embroiled in scandal (something about a state campaign chairman being busted for coke, and a campaign advisor being an accused pedophile for starters...)

McCain is pro-amnesty and he just comes across as weird in his mannerisms, not to mention incredibly fake.

Romney seems to go whichever way the wind seems to be blowing.

Yep, looks like Ron Paul is the only real republican on the plate. Consistent voting record, pro-life, pro-America, pro-conservative fiscal policy, pro-limited government, strict Constitutionalist...a true Jeffersonian Constitutionalist Conservative... at the head of an historic grass-roots Liberty movement, attracting all those people from both the GOP and the Democrud parties who are sick and tired of being sick and tired of the same old-same old big government, neo-commie politics...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, Rudy is pro-abortion and pro-homosexual, not to mention has a distinctly less than-Christian-conservative family history with all the divorces and whatnot, not to mention some of his top campaign people being embroiled in scandal (something about a state campaign chairman being busted for coke, and a campaign advisor being an accused pedophile for starters&#8230;)</p>
<p>McCain is pro-amnesty and he just comes across as weird in his mannerisms, not to mention incredibly fake.</p>
<p>Romney seems to go whichever way the wind seems to be blowing.</p>
<p>Yep, looks like Ron Paul is the only real republican on the plate. Consistent voting record, pro-life, pro-America, pro-conservative fiscal policy, pro-limited government, strict Constitutionalist&#8230;a true Jeffersonian Constitutionalist Conservative&#8230; at the head of an historic grass-roots Liberty movement, attracting all those people from both the GOP and the Democrud parties who are sick and tired of being sick and tired of the same old-same old big government, neo-commie politics&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://conservablogs.com/wyovotes/2007/11/07/theyre-endorsing-who/#comment-4891</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 07:59:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conservablogs.com/wyovotes/2007/11/07/theyre-endorsing-who/#comment-4891</guid>
		<description>Makes me wonder who Fallwell would be pulling for if he were still alive. This whole endorsement war is getting absurd. People say "Well, we gotta have someone that can beat Hillary..."

My contention is that Hillary has a high negative rating among men and women, so beating her is not going to be that hard. Of course with her recent meltdown commencement, she may not get the nomination anyway. 

Then people say that we need someone that is known. Well, look at who the Democrats are picking from. Hillary is married to Bill; Edwards is a former VP candidate, Obama is famous because the media thinks he might not be black enough. Everyone else is virtually unknown. On our side, Romney is Mormon and has to overcome the theological disagreement with Evangelical Christians; Rudy is a red flag for the conservative wing of the party, Fred Thompson was an actor that lost the steam of his campaign shortly after announcing. 

While the others may not be that well known depending on what circles you know in the party, once the race goes national (R vs. D) everyone will know who is who because you won't be able to talk about Hypothetical R vs. D or R vs. Hypothetical D. If the Republican party throws a good Duncan Hunter conservative into the ring, he will win against whatever socialist the Dems annoint.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Makes me wonder who Fallwell would be pulling for if he were still alive. This whole endorsement war is getting absurd. People say &#8220;Well, we gotta have someone that can beat Hillary&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>My contention is that Hillary has a high negative rating among men and women, so beating her is not going to be that hard. Of course with her recent meltdown commencement, she may not get the nomination anyway. </p>
<p>Then people say that we need someone that is known. Well, look at who the Democrats are picking from. Hillary is married to Bill; Edwards is a former VP candidate, Obama is famous because the media thinks he might not be black enough. Everyone else is virtually unknown. On our side, Romney is Mormon and has to overcome the theological disagreement with Evangelical Christians; Rudy is a red flag for the conservative wing of the party, Fred Thompson was an actor that lost the steam of his campaign shortly after announcing. </p>
<p>While the others may not be that well known depending on what circles you know in the party, once the race goes national (R vs. D) everyone will know who is who because you won&#8217;t be able to talk about Hypothetical R vs. D or R vs. Hypothetical D. If the Republican party throws a good Duncan Hunter conservative into the ring, he will win against whatever socialist the Dems annoint.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sunflower Desert</title>
		<link>http://conservablogs.com/wyovotes/2007/11/07/theyre-endorsing-who/#comment-4860</link>
		<dc:creator>Sunflower Desert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 03:19:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conservablogs.com/wyovotes/2007/11/07/theyre-endorsing-who/#comment-4860</guid>
		<description>I'm just bewildered Scott ... I have to admit, the Brownback endorsing McPain really ticked me off, and now, the Robertson Guilani thing is just absurd. Argh!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m just bewildered Scott &#8230; I have to admit, the Brownback endorsing McPain really ticked me off, and now, the Robertson Guilani thing is just absurd. Argh!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
